this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
84 points (93.8% liked)

News

22839 readers
3623 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Elon Musk has no easy way out of his fight with the European Commission, which is investigating whether his social-media site X breached rules designed to limit illegal content and disinformation. The billionaire is facing determined adversaries in the relevant Commissioners Thierry Breton and Margrethe Vestager, who have a new legal tool. Musk may eventually conclude that pulling the plug makes sense.

The Commission last month issued a preliminary finding, opens new tab that X had breached the Digital Services Act (DSA), a sprawling new piece of legislation, opens new tab that aims to combat harmful online content. Among other things, Brussels took issue with the site’s blue user checkmarks, which it fears bestow a false credibility on some accounts. X said it disagreed with the Commission’s assessment. Another investigation, into the way Musk’s site moderates disinformation and illegal content, is ongoing.

Breton took the unusual step of reminding Musk publicly about the DSA on X, causing consternation in Brussels but also highlighting the Frenchman’s commitment to the case. The ultimate possible penalties include fines equivalent to 6% of revenue.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DmMacniel 32 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (22 children)

Elon is such a manchild. And those who follow him zealously are brain maga dead idiots and outright weird.

Its truly remarkable how fast he was able to ruin such ubiquitous software like Twitter.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 weeks ago (16 children)

SpaceX is cool. I wish Shotwell was calling all the shots and Musk departed the company. Clearly, Shotwell is running a competent company despite Musk’s involvement

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (15 children)

SpaceX is polluting like a motherfucker, breaking ecological laws all over the place, and the only reason they don't get hammered is because they're in fucking Texas. It's the same for anything safety related in the company as well. This is the guy who "didn't like yellow" so he demanded that all warning signs not be as visible. SpaceX is a fucking OSHA inspectors god damned nightmare. Once again, jack shit happens because he's in Texas and the Governor and AG are outright protecting him.

Can we stop sucking the dick of tech companies that fuck up the planet, ignore safety laws, and are raping the public for a quick buck?

Fuck Musk, Fuck SpaceX, and fucking grow up, none of these people are good people if they're willing to sell their souls and lives to these assholes to get the job done. Especially when they're willing to ignore safety rules at the expense of their own workers to do it. They can all die in a fucking fire for all I care. (And if they have their way with safety rules, it will fucking happen!)

EDIT: Also, pro-tip: We're never actually going to fucking Mars. We can barely function in a biosphere actually specifically attuned to us. If you're all in on this Mars shit, you've been taken for a ride by a fucking charlatan. It's literally unsurvivable and we don't have the technology to change that. We can't even terraform our own planet, with life and water on it. We could be actually spending money on fixing our biosphere but I guess rich asshole ambitions to be the King of Mars plays better than fucking reality to a lot of chumps.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

SpaceX is blocking access to a public beach because Musk is still involved. Hell, SpaceX is in Texas because of Musk. SpaceX’s work culture is because Musk is a prick.

Everything you mentioned about SpaceX is really Musk. As I said, SpaceX would be better without Musk.

And mars is pipe dream.

But science is cool. Being able to do zero gravity experiments is cool. SpaceX has the only reliable rocket right now - and it’s beating the competition by a healthy margin

Also, I’m glad that you are in a position to turn down jobs. Some people aren’t.

[–] DmMacniel 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Also, I’m glad that you are in a position to turn down jobs. Some people aren’t.

you've got to stand up for your morals and your self-respect eventually though.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

That’s fair.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

If you're working at SpaceX, you're not exactly struggling to find a job because you're not easily replaced. You're not flipping burgers, or some other job that is coded as "low skill labor." They don't hire janitorial directly, they contract out those kind of jobs.

But sure, somehow engineers at SpaceX aren't on a position to turn down jobs. Get the fuck out of here with this shit.

Also, I'd prefer science that actually helps our biosphere, which last I checked, lots of that science can be done on terra firma. Very little of it needs to be done in space. It's a lot of waste for somewhere that doesn't help us survive as a species in the short-term and only maybe helps us survive in the long-term. Space science can fucking eat it.

There's lots of public sector jobs. Oh no! They pay less. Whatever will these people do with... less money! Seriously give me a fucking break.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago

It isn't so much that public sector jobs pay less, it's that they pay so little (even with locality adjustments) that you can't afford to live near them: Oh, and you have to live near them, because the government as a whole maintains a raging hate-on for telework/WFH.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Very little of it needs to be done in space. It’s a lot of waste for somewhere that doesn’t help us survive as a species in the short-term and only maybe helps us survive in the long-term. Space science can fucking eat it.

So your argument is against spaceflight in general? Modern technology, like the computer or phone you're using now to post, wouldn't exist without spaceflight.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

ARPAnet literally was developed without spaceflight what the fuck are you talking about mate lmao

IBM has been making computation devices since 1911... 8 years after the first human flight on a plane. They made punch-cards for the Nazi's to track people for fucks sake.

...but sure, they wouldn't exist without spaceflight.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

ARPAnet literally was developed without spaceflight what the fuck are you talking about mate lmao

Indirectly ARPAnet was partially created to respond to threats from spaceflight, specifically nuclear ICBMs. However we don't even need to argue that one because there's a much more direct link I'm referring to.

IBM has been making computation devices since 1911… 8 years after the first human flight on a plane. They made punch-cards for the Nazi’s to track people for fucks sake.

Why is it the computer that you're posting from isn't the size of a large room or even a full sized refrigerator? Miniaturization is the answer. Why did miniaturization of computers happen? Spaceflight.

"NASA gave IBM $26.6million to build a computer capable of running the necessary programs, and the specifications were brutal. IBM had to create a system capable of proving the feasibility of docking in space, all packed into a box no bigger than 19in high, 15in wide, 13in deep, and weighing less than 60 pounds."

source

That's what the fuck I'm talking about mate.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

So the H1B system is a mess entirely of it's own and that happens to folks who came via H1B visas at any job.

You're not convincing me that we should feel bad for these specific people at SpaceX because of a systemic issue. I feel bad for them due to the nature of the system, not because they chose to work at SpaceX, specifically. That was still a choice, and while they're still in their parent country, still a decision they can say "no" to. It's a choice borne of exploitation at its core, and the fact that SpaceX employs so many H1B workers should be viewed as another negative against the company instead of another reason to let the company off the hook.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)