this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
356 points (91.6% liked)

Technology

58937 readers
3476 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (20 children)

To be fair, it is useful in some regards.

I'm not a huge fan of Amazon, but last time I had an issue with a parcel it was sorted out insanely fast by the AI assistant on the website.

Within literally 2 minutes I'd had a refund confirmed. No waiting for people to eventually pick up the phone after 40 minutes. No misunderstanding or annoying questions. The moment I pressed send on my message it instantly started formulating a reply.

The truncated version went:

"Hey I meant to get [x] delivery, but it hasn't arrived. Can I get a refund?"

"Sure, your money will go back into [y] account in a few days. If the parcel turns up in the meantime, you can send it back by dropping it off at [z]"

Done. Absolutely painless.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 63 points 2 months ago (5 children)

How is a chatbot here better, faster, or more accurate than just a "return this" button on a web page? Chat bots like that take 10x the programming effort and actively make the user experience worse.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

And it could hallucinate, so you would need to add further validation after the fact

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)