A Boring Dystopia

9777 readers

265 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

givesomefucks@lemmy.world

726

Starbucks' new CEO will supercommute 1,000 miles from California to Seattle office instead of relocating (www.cnbc.com)

submitted 3 months ago by Midnight@slrpnk.net to c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world

138 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Starbucks says Niccol can live in his home in Newport Beach, California and commute to Starbucks' head office 1,000 miles away on a corporate jet

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lemmus@lemmy.world 223 points 3 months ago (16 children)

The sooner we destroy all private jets the better.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure that private (meaning small) jets can have valid use cases, it's the abuse by the rich that is the problem.

[–] dexa_scantron@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Private" doesn't mean "small". It means "privately owned", which means by a rich person.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Even if we are talking about specifically jets that are owned privately, they could have legit use cases. It's the abuse that is the issue. I agree with the whole "eat the rich" sentiment, but that's a separate issue. In the system where rich people exist, the problem is abuse.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I vote for we start destroying the private jets without reservation and if we encounter a legitimate use case we'll deal with it at that time.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

Many could be refitted for worthy uses like fighting wildfires and transporting patients

[–] abfarid@startrek.website -5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But that won't solve anything. That's like treating diabetes by drinking diet soda.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That worked for me, that and sugar free Gatorade. Took me down from 8.3 to 4.5 without insuline. That being said, I'm an anomaly in that I don't eat much processed food or bread. Just a really bad pop addiction.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah, maybe it was a bad example, because in some very specific scenario, it can work. My point was that treating a symptom won't cure the underlying disease. Just like as long as there are rich people, trying to take away their planes won't work.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Legit use cases… Make A Wish comes to mind, but maybe that’d be a corporate jet or not a traditionally-private jet.

Any exemptions for sports teams or anything? VIPs whose lives are at risk through no real fault of their own…

[–] rainynight65 4 points 3 months ago

What you're describing are use cases for charter flights - renting an aircraft for a specific, temporary purpose, usually from a company specialising in such flights - they own or lease the aircraft and employ the flight crew and maintenance staff.

load more comments (14 replies)