Technology

58083 readers

3104 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1174

YouTube is Losing The War Against Adblockers (www.howtogeek.com)

submitted 4 weeks ago by AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

472 comments fedilink hide all child comments

YouTube is intensifying efforts to combat adblockers, including blocking video playback and warning users of potential account suspension.
Increased ads on YouTube have driven many users to adblockers, hurting both YouTube’s ad revenue and content creators reliant on ad-based income.
Despite these measures, many users are leaving YouTube or finding workarounds, leading creators to seek alternative revenue streams off-platform.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

youtube keeps shooting themselves in the foot

How are they doing that? Users who aren't watching ads have absolutely zero value to YouTube, and only cause increased use of their computing resources. If they leave, YT has lost absolutely nothing, and gained a decrease in energy use. Most likely these people won't leave YT altogether but just go back to watching ads or paying for premium, which is exactly the point.

Not saying I give a shit, that's just reality.

[–] darkkite@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

absolutely zero value to YouTube this is not true. non-paying users will like, comment, share to others making the platform more popular. and if they're ads were less intrusive they would actually be more likely to be shown.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

You are grossly overestimating the value of your likes and comments.

[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Maybe they are, but it's not "absolutely zero" like you said.

[–] darkkite@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

thanks. exactly my point

https://www.forbes.com/sites/ianshepherd/2024/08/21/cristiano-ronaldo-smashes-records-with-massive-youtube-channel-launch/

you can thank the non-paying youtube members who made post like this possible

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Disagree. You're forgetting the part about consuming their resources.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 weeks ago

I'd argue they risk losing users who post links to their videos online. It's likely the same group who tend to use ad blockers are also the ones more likely to link a video online, so YouTube would miss out on all the non-adblock users clicking links and watching the videos that way.