Comic Strips

11974 readers

2107 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
The comic must be a complete story.
If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
You may post comics from others or your own.
If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
Politeness.
Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.

Web of links

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
!memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lawrence@lemmy.world

532

A.I. Artist (files.catbox.moe)

submitted 3 weeks ago by Maven@lemmy.zip to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Beldarofremulak@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Everyone can write a prompt. Not everyone can write a prompt that gets around vulgarity filters and outputs an image of Jesus twerking. That's where the real value is IMHO.

[–] undefined@links.hackliberty.org 7 points 3 weeks ago

Imagine writing a prompt for ChatGPT to generate the prompt to get around vulgarity filters.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And if that person can manage to find a market that will purchase that Image, they deserve to sell it

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I can't imagine there's a market for it. AI art isn't copyrightable, and even if they just post a low res preview then that allows anyone to simply use an AI upscaler on it to get a satisfactory output

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Here's what the US copyright office says about when AI art is or isn't copyrightable:

In the case of works containing AI-generated material, the Office will consider whether the AI contributions are the result of “mechanical reproduction” or instead of an author’s “own original mental conception, to which [the author] gave visible form.” 24 The answer will depend on the circumstances, particularly how the AI tool operates and how it was used to create the final work.25 This is necessarily a case-by-case inquiry.

So if an image looks like AI and you decide to just take it, legally that could be a risky proposition if you don't know the artist's workflow and the situation doesn't exactly match up with settled case law. Afaik most of the market is for custom images, so in practice most of the time it's not going to be a situation of just putting in a prompt and handing over the result but rather a multi step process and a hybrid of different techniques, which could weigh more towards generated content or more towards traditional drawing or image manipulation. The reason to pay someone for that instead of just using AI yourself would be the same as the reason for paying for non-AI art; they have the skills to get better results than you easily can on your own. The reason an artist might use AI is that it improves quality and/or reduces the amount of work.