Rust

5938 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

EdTheLegendary@programming.dev

kahnclusions@programming.dev

torcherist@programming.dev

Which is more important for rust compilation: higher number of cores or faster single core performance? (programming.dev)

submitted 2 months ago by Timely_Jellyfish_2077@programming.dev to c/rust@programming.dev

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Planning to build a PC in couple of weeks.

What is the optimal number of cores to have without having diminishing returns?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BB_C@programming.dev 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

for a build of your crate only: single core perf.

Until the parallel compiler feature (-Z threads=<n>) stabilizes and becomes more complete.

It's also always worth mentioning that the choice of linker is important. Using mold or lld can significantly speed things up in some use-cases.

Beyond that, codegen-units and lto profile options are also important.

And finally, for development purposes, the code generator is important, as cranelift provides much faster compile times, but resulting binaries are not as optimized as LLVM-generated ones.

[–] verstra@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

Oh, i have to try these out to see if it effects my development cycle. I do notice that cargo check is super fast, but cargo build takes a long time. So codegen and linker could be the source of slowness.