this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
30 points (89.5% liked)

Google Pixel

5819 readers
17 users here now

The World's Google Pixel community!

This community is for lemmings to gather and discuss all things related to the Google Pixel phone and other related hardware. Feel free to ask questions, seek advice, and engage in discussions around the Pixel and its ecosystem.

We ask you to be polite when addressing others and respect Lemmy.world's rules.

NSFW content is not allowed and will immediately get you banned.

It also goes without saying that self-promotion of any nature and referral links are not allowed. When in doubt, contact the mod team first.

Also, please, no politics.

For more general Android discussions, see !android@lemmy.world.

This community is not in any way affiliated with Google. If you are looking for customer support regarding your Pixel phone, look here instead: https://support.google.com/pixelphone/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemmyuser100002@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (5 children)

The fact that they've bolted on "with Gemini" to every listing doesn't bode well.

[–] superfes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Free for 1 year (~$240/yr afterward)

[–] FederatedSaint@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bahahaha $240/yr is beyond ludicrous. They should be paying us to use it lol.

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I can't imagine any use for their "AI" that would make it worth $20/month.

[–] lemmyuser100002@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Usually they don't bolt on "With [Feature]" to their phones though don't they? I wonder if they think the Pixel name alone isn't enough to sell it anymore.

[–] five82@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

To me, "with Gemini" further underscores big tech's complete obsession with everything AI. I don't really see it as a commentary on the phones themselves.

load more comments (2 replies)