Green Energy

2175 readers

159 users here now

everything about energy production

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

poVoq@slrpnk.net

SteveKLord@slrpnk.net

117

Solar Photovoltaics with Battery Storage Cheaper than Conventional Power Plants (cleantechnica.com)

submitted 2 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/energy@slrpnk.net

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'll note that aggregate system cost still benefits significantly from including wind and other non-solar sources of energy; having a mix of different intermittent sources (and some firm generation such as geothermal) means less storage is needed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (5 children)

We really should be installing neighborhood sodium batteries everywhere. It would help to capture residential solar and smooth out the grid. No more mass power outages during storms either.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

How resilient are these batteries to flooding? I live on the Texas coast and have been through enough hurricanes that I know that flooding is just inevitable here. I'm not trying to play down the effectiveness of the technology, just wondering how they might fare compared to our terrible power systems in Texas?

[–] Nyssa@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You'd probably site them on higher ground outside of the flood plane. Add in flood walls, etc. if storm surge is a concern

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

There really isn't any "outside the flood plane" around here. Or flood walls. Or infrastructure. God. Why do I live here?

load more comments (2 replies)