Technology

59276 readers

3933 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

279

Google's AI Overviews now link to Wikipedia and LinkedIn more than Reddit, study finds (www.businessinsider.com)

submitted 4 months ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how Reddit investors are feeling when they find out even Google couldn't pull something valuable out of the Reddit data

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yet I still add "Reddit" to a search query when looking for product reviews or technical/home maintenance support, lol

I can do it really well manually...but Google's AI sucks at it.

They forgot to account for trolls...and how often trolls would get upvoted for the lulz

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

sarcasm is already hard to understand online, even harder for generative AI

I know sometimes I would take a peek at the person's comment history to see if they were well informed / a shill for the product. The AI can't do that

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Generative AI doesn't understand anything, it just adds it to it's model. If more people are being sarcastic than genuine in the data set, that'll be more represented in the generated text.

AI could categorize users by competency (i.e. how often they discuss specific topics and agree with some corpus), but I doubt it does that. It's probably just taking posts at face value.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Doing that would require significantly more compute power, so there’s little economic incentive.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

AI could categorize users by competency (i.e. how often they discuss specific topics and agree with some corpus), but I doubt it does that. It’s probably just taking posts at face value.

This is not being done though right? I haven't heard anything about content ranking with connections outside of Google seemingly using authors name is articles from large news sources.

[–] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We need to stop calling it AI. It's LLM and there is no intelligence.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

I know it's not "intelligent", but I don't get gatekeeping the phrase "AI".

We were perfectly happy to use "AI" to refer to the logic of computer-controlled enemies in video games for probably decades.