this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
1243 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59099 readers
3204 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
1243
Custom ROMs have had just about enough of being Android's second-class citizens (www.androidauthority.com)
submitted 2 months ago by FutileRecipe@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
252 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

TL;DR

  • Efforts like Graphene OS face increasing pressure from apps that refuse to run on non-standard Android.
  • The custom ROM project characterizes Google’s approach to device attestation as incomplete and flawed.
  • Graphene OS is prepared to take legal action if Google won’t let it pass Play Integrity checks.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] saiarcot895@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago

A manufacturer's Android can have special privileges for their own apps, and almost will certainly have special privileges for Google's apps.

Graphene by default wouldn't give special privileges to any app, so that's at least a plus.

It's true that it would be locked down, but you at least have a couple more controls over how locked down compared to a manufacturer's OS.