Gaming

19947 readers

38 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

peternile@lemmy.ml

122

'Fallout: London' Is The Most Surprisingly Terrifying Game In The Series (www.inverse.com)

submitted 2 months ago by moreeni@lemm.ee to c/gaming@lemmy.ml

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Fallout: London is a must-play. The marriage of Fallout 4’s more modern gameplay and New Vegas’ exemplary role-playing mechanics is a match made in heaven, one that occasionally surpasses Bethesda’s 2015 game.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 57 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It just shows that Bethesda is absolutely dogshit in making good games.

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 months ago (3 children)

They make game engines and rely on the community for the rest.

[–] msage@programming.dev 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They made 1 (one) game engine, and keep propping it up every release.

[–] ValenThyme@reddthat.com 13 points 2 months ago

me giggling when i realized V.A.T.S. had been reused for ship combat in Starfield.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 16 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I want a FO or TES game that's just a modder playground.

Build the world, don't populate it with anything.
Divide the world into a grid, let modders submit mods to a central database and register them with the grid squares they alter.
Let the game download an assortment of mods (maybe using user-defined tags to preference certain content) that fills out the world, using their grid square registration system to ensure no overlapping / conflicting content.)
Let players rate content they play.
Reward the modders who made popular content in some way.

Obviously there's a lot of glaring problems with this, but in my head, it'd be awesome.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like you just invented Roblox.

[–] msage@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Or Metaverse

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Second Life 😤

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Definitely sounds like an interesting concept. I can also imagine some people seeing it as developers not actually making a game, instead getting their community to do the work.

I think maybe letting people design a building or block at a time, then doing voting and integrating the winner into the game could be a neat way to go about it

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

That's basically Starfield, and what it's trying to do.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

barely. have you seen how buggy bethesda games are?

i dont get how they are still a thing