Politics

304 readers

792 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

US air force avoids PFAS water cleanup, citing supreme court’s Chevron ruling (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 months ago by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@sh.itjust.works

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The ruling is expected to have a profound impact on the EPA’s ability to protect the public from pollution, and the Tucson dispute highlights the high stakes in such scenarios – clean drinking water and the health of hundreds of thousands of people hangs in the balance.

Several air force bases are largely responsible for trichloroethylene (TCE) – volatile organic compounds – and PFAS contaminating drinking water sources in Tucson. A 10-sq-mile (26 sq km) area around the facilities and Tucson international airport were in the 1980s designated as a Superfund site, an action reserved for the nation’s most polluted areas.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Oh, cool. Not only is it a way to avoid corporate accountability, it's a way for our government to slip accountability too. Thanks, SCOTUS! I'm certain this is exactly what the founders had in mind, a totally unaccountable government that gets to pick winners and make them totally unaccountable too.