linuxmemes

20688 readers

1170 users here now

I use Arch btw

Sister communities:

LemmyMemes: Memes
LemmyShitpost: Anything and everything goes.
RISA: Star Trek memes and shitposts

Community rules

Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
Be civil
Post Linux-related content
No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

poopsmith@lemmy.world

zephyr@lemmy.world

621

Fuck-up Assessment Form (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 month ago by 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago (13 children)

What's wrong with btrfs?

[–] SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (6 children)

My only gripe with btrfs is that I've had systems come down from a single drive failure in raid quite "often" when compared to other FS.

ZFS is a ram hog but I always could do a live resilvering without downtime.

[–] hersh@literature.cafe 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

btrfs's RAID features are not production-ready, and at this point I doubt they ever will be. See:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#Implemented_but_not_recommended_for_production_use

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Btrfs

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Btrfs-Warning-RAID5-RAID6

ZFS is definitely more robust.

[–] SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is true for raid 5 & 6. Raid 0, 1, and 10 are supposed to be production ready. I use raid 10 only with btrfs, anything else and I use zfs or mdadm.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't go above two disks

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (9 replies)