this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
627 points (97.4% liked)

Fediverse

27788 readers
362 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source: https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/dailystats

Context: Reddit made a few controversial annoucements, feel free to have a look at !reddit@lemmy.world

For people wanting to discuss why some people focus on Lemmy's growth, here is a recent thread from !asklemmy@lemmy.world :

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ericjmorey@discuss.online 13 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Active accounts is not active users. We shouldn't lie to ourselves. I wouldn't be surprised if the number of active users is half of the active account number.

[–] iso@lemy.lol 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

More realistic than mainstream social media platforms. On Lemmy, the number of active users is measured by posts, comments and votes.

[–] ericjmorey@discuss.online 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think that's a mistake, but also the point is that saying users when you mean accounts is lying to yourself. Users here have multiple accounts, I have 7.

[–] iso@lemy.lol 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, almost almost all of us have more than one account, but not everyone uses more than one account at the same time. I think these numbers are correct. There should be a margin of deviation of at most 10%.

[–] ericjmorey@discuss.online 5 points 1 month ago

Over 6 months and over a month, I think most users with multiple accounts use their accounts at least once to post, comment, or vote. So it wouldn't surprise me if active users to active accounts was 1:2

load more comments (5 replies)