this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
627 points (97.4% liked)

Fediverse

27788 readers
593 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source: https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/dailystats

Context: Reddit made a few controversial annoucements, feel free to have a look at !reddit@lemmy.world

For people wanting to discuss why some people focus on Lemmy's growth, here is a recent thread from !asklemmy@lemmy.world :

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlackLaZoR@kbin.run 90 points 1 month ago (50 children)

IMO fediverse is big enough now to serve as reddit replacement.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (13 children)

We already have instances that go down or suffer from intermittent federation issues when lemmy.world gets a bit more active. The most conservative estimates are putting Reddit at 75 million DAU. If we get to 1% of that, you can bet that our current network would choke, badly.

Not only we need more instances, we also need to be a lot smarter about their organization and how to architect this network. I think we will only be able to grow larger if we make a more intentional separation between topic-based instances and "people-home" instances, so that we can have a better spread of the load.

[–] machinin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We need more instances, but we need to be a lot smarter about the structure. I think we will only be able to grow larger if we make a more intentional separation between topic-based instances and "people-home" instances, so that we can have a better spread of the load.

I don't know if it would help with load-balancing, but I feel hash tags would be better than communities.

[–] ericjmorey@discuss.online 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Isn't that just Mastodon and similar services? I prefer the community url scheme more that the hashtag scheme.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 month ago

I agree that the hashtag scheme is bad. It attracts people that want to self-promote or bots.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 6 points 1 month ago

This goes against the design of ActivityPub, which requires people to follow actors. A hashtag does not have a single name, so people would have to follow all servers and/or the servers would have to relay activities that are not originating from their actors. It is possible, clunky to implement.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (46 replies)