this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
71 points (100.0% liked)
TechTakes
1425 readers
271 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
i wonder if that means that they don't have a way to flash this thing after it's been assembled
also, i bet that it's completely fine with GDPR too, no issues at all
I haven't read into it at all so treat this as pure speculation, but from context: the t-mo thing sounds/smells like MNO lock on the SIM service. a lot of operators offer subset-services type products (e.g. SIMs with only data services, SIMs that only work within a specific localized network, etc etc), and I could see this maybe having been launched with something like that
I'm unfortunately not current enough on the technical implementation of eSIM (especially wrt issuance and HLR interaction) to make a guess as to how this would impact if it were eSIM vs hard SIM
this includes "It’s a standalone device with its own SIM card" but it doesn't make clear whether eSIM or hard-sim
also, that's a snip quote. the full quote is:
just amazing
I scrubbed through this video to see if it included handling/inserting a SIM card, it didn't. gonna presume eSIM. probably the deal guess - they signed some kind of special-APN deal with t-mo to get it live, didn't think they'd need to port (or let t-mo have preferential timeframe, or somesuch), and just never implemented it
also, in this video at about 13:10, some hilarious footage: trying to show the shitty projection, entirely out of focus, in a room already-dark to try capture the contrast.... because it has that little luminance on the project (which is duh, because battery device)
many, many lols