this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
134 points (91.9% liked)

Technology

58009 readers
3007 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Why is this being framed this way.

Rebranding the next gen of your product isn't "killing" it, people are so fucking clickbaitable.

It's the same product, just next gen with better specs abd they're going with a new simpler brand name than "Chromecast with Google TV" (yes that's the actual product name before) and instead the next gen is named "Google TV Streamer"

It's the exact same thing, and all existing hardware will keep working.

Chromecasts are standalone and effectively just running a modified version of Android. They can't really be "killed" as they work over local network. Theoretically any chromecast will last forever as it's functionality is based off a specified open source protocol, so as long as you have a device that can output it (cast), you can cast to your chromecast.

So it's impossible to "kill". I have a gen 1 chromecast that still 100% works fine today.

Newer ~~Chromecasts~~ ahem Google TVs just have more features, like apps you can install and sideload.

People are dumb for falling for this clickbait title.

[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I get what you’re saying, but these new ones are twice the price of the 4K Chromecast. It sucks that they’re killing the $30 HD Chromecast as well, its great for my spare TV. I wouldn’t want to pay 3x that price for essentially the same functionality if I need to replace it.

I know there’s other Android TV boxes that are comparable, but Google’s offering was an easy go-to.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wrote it up elsewhere, but I don't mind the price point.

The built in ethernet port covers a lot of that.

A solid quality ethernet dongle is gonna be $25, so now that's $75 for the 4k CCwGTV + ethernet.

So you're paying $25 extra for the better form factor (2 chained dongles look so bad), the extra ram, better processor, etc

For some folks that might not matter, but I use Steam Link on my CCwGTV and those specs will likely make a tangible boost in gaming performance for quality, frame rate, latency, input lag, etc.

So in my demographic of people gaming with em, I 100% expect it'll be a popular upgrade.

The ethernet part is pretty big, overall. Don't overbook that.

[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m not denying that these features are a welcome addition, I’m just lamenting the loss of the cheaper version for use-cases where those features arent really needed.

I pretty much just watch Youtube on my bedroom TV, and I got one for my mom so she can watch Netflix on her 10 year old 720p 32”. I don’t want to pay $100 for that.

I might get the new one for Steam Link in the living room though, that does sound sick.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

There are 2 CCwGTV models, only 1 of then is being discontinued.

The other one sounds like it'll keep being sold.

But also you can always just buy a chromecast, just cuz they aren't being actively produced doesn't mean you can't find em online

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)