this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
265 points (97.2% liked)

Games

32693 readers
1052 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The dev says this is one of three big announcements. One could possibly be a release date for the mobile version, but I'm not sure what the third could be.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cris16228@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don't really understand your comment - sorry! - but I've played some games with the plasma deck and I still have to understand how to play exactly with it, I do good-ish at first but after a few rounds/first boss I do so little numbers and I can't win, having someone watching what I do wrong and telling me would be great

[–] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

For plasma specifically I'd focus on high additive chip jokers. While that's normally bad advice, consider how crazy good a card with +50 mult on it would be. Now consider that a +100 chip joker is effectively a +50 chip/+50 mult (I know that's not technically true but I'm illustrating a point). Also eventually you do hit a point of diminishing returns because plasma prevents you from having a super high multiplier or chips, so like every build, total score multipliers are the best

[–] Cris16228@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The one who played it before me said it was best to get the X multi jokers so I always ignored the + multi ones and even the X multi final score.. I tried but I don't exactly know which ones do that. I should try with what you said and see if it works, thanks! Which poker hand is better with it?

[–] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's hard to offer strong heuristics for Balatro because you could theoretically build up to a point where you've got a crazy high multiplier but if your chips are low it doesn't matter.

For example let's say you've got a face card 4 of a kind build going with: Pareidolia, Zany, Smiley, Trio, and Family jokers. These give you (respectively) all cards are face cards, +12 mult for 3 of a kind, +20 mult for each hand (all cards are face cards), x3 mult, x4 mult for a total of 384 multiplier! On base 4 of a kind this is

60x([7+12+20]x3x4)=28,080

However if you were to drop smiley face (+5 mult per face) for scary face (+30 chips per face card) which by almost every heuristic is a bad decision your score becomes:

(60+120)x([7+12]x3x4)=41,040

Which is a way bigger score!

So while people can offer general advice like stack high chips on plasma, always go for total score multipliers, etc. sometimes you just have to evaluate your specific build and figure out the best play

Finally outside of decks like abandoned and checkered which are specifically made to get certain hands, there isn't a "best" hand to go for. The highest possible scores I've seen all come from high card builds but most normal players won't get those. I've won two of a kind runs, flush 5 runs, straight runs, flush runs. You just have to evaluate your deck and tarot cards to see your options

[–] Cris16228@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago

This is interesting to know since I would love to win at least one game with plasma since people said it the funniest deck but for some reasons I can't get past ante 2/3. I'm going to try to play a game or 2 trying to buy chip jokers and tarots hoping for the best, I do really need to understand better jokers and synergies between them

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I could have a go at that.