this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
945 points (97.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

19503 readers
1033 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
945
Evolution of C (programming.dev)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by JPDev@programming.dev to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

D kind of did that (C pointers are still an option, alongside with the preferred dynamic arrays, which has the memory safety features), and once I've seen a C compiler fork that retroactively added D-style memory safety features, although they also very much insisted on the "const by default" mantra.

[โ€“] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 months ago

I think this is one of those things where there's no "kind of". Pointers were added for a reason, you're probably not going to implement a database very well without them. If you use them, at some scale you're inevitably going to have memory bugs. Technically, if you were to only use hardcoded printfs, C is memory safe too.