this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
129 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

1163 readers
340 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Another device heads to the Google graveyard.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 month ago (8 children)

In place of the Chromecast, the company will offer the newly announced $99.99 Google TV Streamer, which launches on September 24th. The set-top box comes with some significant spec bumps over the Chromecast with Google TV, such as a processor that’s 22 percent faster, along with Thread and Matter integration.

Replacing it with something 3x as much that more or less does the same thing.

[–] Thrickles@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was already considering Jellyfin as a possible replacement, and this pretty much ensures it.

[–] SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So what will you use as your Jellyfin client then? Roku?

[–] tyler@programming.dev 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Roku is fucking terrible now. I’m not who you asked but I switched off of Roku to an Apple TV and it’s by far the best device you can use unless you’re building something completely custom.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just to clarify, the Jellifin app for Roku is pretty good and has been improving a ton the last year in particular. But yeah, Roku itself is it's own can of worms

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Oh sorry, yeah. No clue about the app but Roku is in the shitter as far as I’m concerned.

[–] Thrickles@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Dunno. I've come to rely on the "cast" functionality from my Android, but finding a FOSS client with even similar functionality is proving difficult.

Chromecast will continue to work, until it doesn't. I'll use that time to test some options and see where I land.

load more comments (6 replies)