Technology

34789 readers

419 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml

251

Google Search is an illegal monopoly — what happens now? (www.theverge.com)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A federal judge has ruled that Google has an illegal monopoly in the US. “The market reality is that Google is the only real choice” as the default search engine, Judge Amit Mehta said in his decision, and he determined it had gotten that way unfairly. It’s a ruling that could portend big changes for the company, but we yet don’t know how big, and we might not for years.

Mehta declared on Monday that Google was liable for violating antitrust laws, vindicating the Department of Justice and a coalition of states that sued the tech giant in 2020. The next step — deciding on remedies for its illegal conduct — begins next month. Both parties must submit a proposed schedule for remedy proceedings by September 4th and then appear at a status conference on September 6th.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/privacy-preserving-attribution

Hardly qualifies as "sending your data to advertisers".

[–] antler@feddit.rocks -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Read the Pocket and Mozilla FakeSpot privacy policies. They collect a lot if data, including browsing history, and do so via Google Analytics. They then share that data with advertisers.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

Okay? What does that have to do with the new advertising API the added support for in 128?