this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
59 points (95.4% liked)

Australia

3582 readers
46 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
lodion@aussie.zone
Fluid@aussie.zone
bestusername@aussie.zone
eatham@aussie.zone
59
Our US friends see the Olympic Medal table differently (aussie.zone)
submitted 3 months ago by Nath@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I stumbled across a sports article from a US publication and thought it interesting that it showed the USA leading the medals table.

Instead of the regular table that gives weight to Gold, silver and bronze, they just see total medals.

I sorta like it. Celebrating all medal winners equally is nice. It feels a little like fudging the numbers, though.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It's absurd. I can see having an issue with the official system, for example if one nation got 2nd in literally every single event the official system would put them near the bottom of the table, which is a little unfair. But giving equal weight is so, so much worse. I saw a meme the other day showing American swimmers on the 2nd and 3rd place podium and an Aussie in 1st, with a headline to the effect of "America beats Australia in swimming". You don't celebrate them all equally because they didn't perform equally. The logical extension of that would be to sort merely by number of participants each country had. Which is absurd. Gold needs to be worth more than bronze for a system to even be worth considering.

A points system could be reasonable. My view is that 1 gold should be better than 2 silver, so 7-3-1 points is where I'd start. That would change the top from CN, FR, JP, AU, GB, SK, US, to FR, CN, US, AU, JP, GB, SK, if I've done my calculations correctly. You get the same order currently if you do 10-4-1 as points. But the conventional system is pretty good anyway.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I found the meme I mentioned above. Thank the gods for never closing old tabs 🙃

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 8 points 3 months ago

Ha! I love it!
Ok, so maybe not all medals are equal after all.

[–] Zess@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That is an Australian person making a joke.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago

Sorry for the late reply. Just cleaning up old tabs…

But anyway, yes. That’s correct. Obviously. But it’s also the natural implication of counting total medals rather than golds or a well-balanced point system.