Technology

59099 readers

3184 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

264

Is Palworld a “dead game”? Who cares, says the game’s developer (arstechnica.com)

submitted 3 months ago by Xatolos@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Toes@ani.social 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I thought the game was neat but far too buggy to enjoy.

I only play these kinds of games with others and after a few days the servers would always grind to a halt or the gameplay would spaz out.

I'm waiting until it's done and I'll try it again.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

I typically do that with many survival games. I skipped Minecraft and Terraria during release and played it when it was at 1.0, and holy cow, they're so deep!

When Valheim came out as early access and only 3 out of 6 biomes finished, reaching the end sucked. Because once you hit it, waiting a year or two for an update is painful.

Fortunately, it's now a pretty oversaturated market. I was playing Vrising, Grounded, Raft, Dinkum, etc and just rotating between these early access games every few months.