this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
817 points (98.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

5353 readers
2962 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works 170 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

In a town in Ohio I used to live in, the answer was 50. There is a law on the books that says its a misdemeanor to lap over 50 times in a day.

Edit: I was slightly wrong - its 100 times in a single session. Source: https://www.onlyinyourstate.com/ohio/crazy-laws-part-2-oh/

[–] atocci@lemmy.world 60 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In a day? These laps don't have to be consecutive for it to be illegal?

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago (1 children)

50 nonconsecutive laps in a day isn't even that much, tbh.

As a cabbie, I could drive 25 fares a day, and if I go back to my station after the fare, then I'd drive one lap while driving the customer home and another while going back myself.

[–] atocci@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's exactly what I was thinking, anyone who drives for their job could easily be crossing the same traffic circle dozens of times a day. That would be against the law?

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Spirit vs intention of law, they wouldn’t be ticketing people who do it for work, it would be for people like OP who have nothing better than be a “menace”.

I’ve thought about getting a few dozen people and just going in a loop around a couple of blocks screwing over the traffic circle. So yeah the laws probably because someone actually decided to do it.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think you mean spirit vs letter of the law, but yeah, any time you count on cops or courts honoring the 'spirit of the law' you're probably gonna get burned.

Of course with this law nobody is gonna get burned unless they are actually doing laps. Cops don't have time to be counting how many times you went through a traffic circle in a day, they've got people and dogs to kill.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

And this perspective is entirely what’s wrong with civilization…..

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Entirely, huh? Nothing else that needs adjusting? lol

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

truly, the worst part of humanity is the refusal to accept cops as our owners and gods

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago

If you do a “straight” (1/2 way around) does it count as 1/2?

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 20 points 2 months ago

So, start a few minutes before midnight, get in 50 laps, then 50 the next day.

[–] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

So what you're saying is you can do 49 donuts around it and it's perfectly legal. Cops love donuts so I'm sure I'm 100% correct

[–] Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Some of those laws are no longer on the books, so I wonder about that one. Like, what does "around the town square" actually mean? There's not a straightforward "town square" in Oxford. And while the article asks "What exactly happened to make Oxford so protective of its town square?", you and I both know the answer is "drunk college students". Also funny that they don't actually show the public sidewalk, but instead the little square between Elliot and Stoddard for the sidewalk law.

Edit: a quick search through the municipal traffic codes doesn't reveal anything, so I'm guessing this is one of Miami's many rumors that happened to get picked up by a less-than-thourough website. Or potentially it used to exist but no longer does. Or maybe I missed it, but I'm willing to bet that's not the case.

[–] DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

I think the law was from the late 60s-mid 70s when driving muscle cars around was a popular past time for young men. My guess is it's a problem that kinda just went away when other types of entertainment became more popular.

[–] kenoh@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would love to get a source on this. I tried but couldn't find anything. That's hilarious if true.

[–] DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Added source to original post

[–] kenoh@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago