When it comes to commits, single feature / scoped commits are quality. So this git history is actually underwhelming if the author is full time. This is a good read.

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm familiar with and practice atomic committing habits. Still seems excessive.

[–] nik9000@programming.dev 10 points 4 months ago

Mine looks a little like that. It's my job though. Everything's on GitHub.

[–] Zangoose@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

That article also mentions squashing merges though, which would lower the contribution count by a lot unless there's a GitHub setting to have separate branch commits tracked that I'm missing out on.