this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2021
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

34789 readers
419 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google's 16 years of messenger wheel-spinning has allowed products from more focused companies to pass it by. Embarrassingly, nearly all of these products are much younger than Google's messaging efforts. Consider competitors like WhatsApp (12 years old), Facebook Messenger (nine years old), iMessage (nine years old), and Slack (eight years old)—Google Talk even had video chat four years before Zoom was a thing.

Currently, you would probably rank Google's offerings behind every other big-tech competitor. A lack of any kind of top-down messaging leadership at Google has led to a decade and a half of messaging purgatory, with Google both unable to leave the space altogether and unable to commit to a single product. While companies like Facebook and Salesforce invest tens of billions of dollars into a lone messaging app, Google seems content only to spin up an innumerable number of under-funded, unstable side projects led by job-hopping project managers.

Because no single company has ever failed at something this badly, for this long, with this many different products (and because it has barely been a month since the rollout of Google Chat), the time has come to outline the history of Google messaging. Prepare yourselves, dear readers, for a non-stop rollercoaster of new product launches, neglected established products, unexpected shut-downs, and legions of confused, frustrated, and exiled users.

In the beginning, there was Google Talk, and things were good...

See https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/08/a-decade-and-a-half-of-instability-the-history-of-google-messaging-apps/

#technology #Google #messengers

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

I just don't really get why Google tries to tap into the instant messenger market as the userbase is hooked elsewhere. Especially considering how they have a bad track record of so many failed messenger apps. The company can either give up or learn from its past mistakes, but the latter is yet to happen.

[–] danie10@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

I really wish we had a proper acknowledged open standard for messaging like we have for e-mail. Then any client app can be developed, but we can all interconnect and communicate from anywhere. Yes we have XMPP but it never seems to have taken off as a standard for everyone.

[–] QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

I don't see it happening any time soon.

[–] Helix@feddit.de 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

Matrix seems to be adopted very well by some communities, especially in the tech world. I reduced my messaging apps from WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal, Threema, Discord, IRC, Slack and Wire to just Signal, Discord and Matrix.