this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2022
0 points (NaN% liked)
China, 中国
848 readers
13 users here now
English
This is a forum dedicated to China, Chinese culture Chinese language, and Chinese people.
Rules:
- Be civil, be respectful, don't attack other users
- No racism, sinophobia, or other bigotry allowed
- No misinformation
- Follow all other Lemmy rules
中文
这是一个专门讨论中国、中国文化、中国语言和中国人的论坛。
规则:
- 要文明,要尊重,不要攻击其他用户
- 不允许有种族主义、仇视中国人或其他偏执行为
- 不允许故意提供错误信息
- 遵守 Lemmy 的所有其他规则
Related communities / 相关的互联网论坛
Community icon by CustomDesign on MYICONFINDER, licensed under CC BY-NC 3.0
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What is wrong with their assessment? Why do you think ad hominems will make you right?
Copyright laws (and other IP laws) exist in China. Ergo "never existed in Chinese history" is false on the face of it. Q.E.D.
Duh.
Then why didn't you say so and for example link an English translation but insult them?
You must be pretty new to arguments in general when you think people just believe you without a source if you just insult them enough. Incidentally, you also violate the rules of this Lemmy community:
There's nothing to listen to if you don't say something of substance.
Because there's not enough hours in the day to link to trivially-searched information to counter every ignoramus that thinks their opinion matters anyway.
I'm not their Google/Duckduckgo/Bing/Baidu/whatever stenographer. Google et al are a few keystrokes away. They can do the legwork themselves.
It takes longer to type your useless rebuttals and insults than to counter with facts. You're just not capable to do that apparently.