this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
1230 points (95.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9582 readers
194 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The pp size is inversely proportional to the truck size.

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 31 points 3 months ago (2 children)

that's why I ride a bike.

I could get away with a unicycle if it weren't for my MASSIVE SCHLONG requiring support and it's easier that way than getting two unis.

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I suppose you are using a lady bike then so there's more space for the schlong?

[–] Im_old@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No I have a sheat for the schlong on the horizontal bar of the frame

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Im_old@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Ironically with a woman's bike IRL

[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Traditionally bikes for women had the horizontal stabilizing bar much lower probably to account for dresses and the like, but the differences has been slightly washed out over the years.

[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

The top bike is referred to as the "lady bike", as you've said, but for any external viewers, the top bike is probably a better choice for city bike in general. There's the point about not having to swing your leg around when mounting and dismounting the bike, true, but the bike also promotes an upright seating position as opposed to a totally horizontal, leaned down, motorcycle like position, which will be more comfortable for long ride periods for most riders, at the cost of aerodynamics. The bottom bike is extreme overkill for most uses, but it's also the bike you're going to probably see most often in the US outside of mountain bikes, since nobody tends to commute on bike here.

[–] pooberbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

I'm picturing the two unicycle method illustrated in the style of Dr Seuss

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I prefer walking, and use a bicycle when it's possible. So sadly doesn't check out.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Bicycle size isn't zero, you you pp size isn't infinity. It does check out.