Artificial Intelligence

First of all, let me explain what "hapax legomena" is: it refers to words (and, by extension, concepts) that occurred just once throughout an entire corpus of text. An example is the word "hebenon", occurring just once within Shakespeare's Hamlet. Therefore, "hebenon" is a hapax legomenon. The "hapax legomenon" concept itself is a kind of hapax legomenon, IMO.

According to Wikipedia, hapax legomena are generally discarded from NLP as they hold "little value for computational techniques". By extension, the same applies to LLMs, I guess.

While "hapax legomena" originally refers to words/tokens, I'm extending it to entire concepts, described by these extremely unknown words.

I am a curious mind, actively seeking knowledge, and I'm constantly trying to learn a myriad of "random" topics across the many fields of human knowledge, especially rare/unknown concepts (that's how I learnt about "hapax legomena", for example). I use three LLMs on a daily basis (GPT-3, LLama and Gemini), expecting to get to know about words, historical/mythological figures and concepts unknown to me, lost in the vastness of human knowledge, but I now know, according to Wikipedia, that general LLMs won't point me anything "obscure" enough.

This leads me to wonder: are there LLMs and/or NLP models/datasets that do not discard hapax? Are there LLMs that favor less frequent data over more frequent data?

You heard me, I'm curious, I know there's all those dumbass deepnude programs but has anyone actually tried to make a model that takes images of nude humans and puts clothing on them? I guess they don't have to be nude but that does remove a lot of variables in the generation.

I think it would be an interesting little tool to try out new looks you never would really mess with before

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/14979173

• neural network is trained with deep Q-learning in its own training environment
• controls the game with twinject

demonstration video of the neural network playing Touhou (Imperishable Night):

it actually makes progress up to the stage boss which is fairly impressive. it performs okay in its training environment but performs poorly in an existing bullet hell game and makes a lot of mistakes.

let me know your thoughts and any questions you have!

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/21273521

Well, looks like we’re done here. Lemmy, Reddit, Facebook and Twitter can pack it in because no we can have AI handle social media for us.

Guess it’s finally time to go outside, then.

I created this video after being spammed by artist groups claiming that Generative AI uses copied samples to create work.

I just told it to

Make a cheatsheet with two columns: on the left, Markdown syntax; on the right, the ReStructured Text equivalent.

and it started well but after a minute it seemed to enter a loop outputting the same thing over and over again.

Is this something one should report, or is it something that sometimes happens with ai chats?

With the proliferation of AI powered deepfakes at galactic speeds, there will be nobody (especially women) that will have shred of privacy left in few years. It does not matter if it is fake photo or not, nobody should be able to see "you" naked unless you allow it. But with rise of tools that are able to run on consumer level hardware, that seems like really losing battle. Since how can we police what a person can run or cannot run on his personal computer? That is another can of worms better not opened, since the idea of some agency being able to monitor what you do on your PC is another dystopia. Soon, you can never be too sure if your neighbor or coworker did not deepfaked you and now every time he looks at you he sees you as sexual object. That is highly uncomfortable though for sure.

Since we cannot possibly stop it, what is the best option moving forward? Normalizing it? Marginalizing it, since it is fake after all? Ignoring it? No option seems very good either.

This goes way beyond current framework of "revenge porn", since when it comes to revenge porn, the case is simple - unlawful distribution without consent. But what about unlawful generation for personal use without consent? I cannot think of legal grounds that could make this criminal offense, since soon we would have to ban even drawing lewd doodles with pencil at home.