mawhrin

they definitely missed out on naming two of the daughers ursa minor maior and ursa maior minor.

ah, a civility connoisseur.

no, it fucking isn't. (see the postscript in linked article.)

i guess it comes down to a philosophical question

no, it doesn't, and it's not a philosophical question (and neither is this a question of philosophy).

the software simply has no cognitive capabilities.

LLMs know nothing. literally. they cannot.

ah, apparently there's an activity popular in the ea circles that is called “fiscal sponsoring” which deals with such unpleasantness. (in the meantime there's a question in the comments about puerto rico minimum wage compliance that's – by pure omission – left without any reply whatsoever)

i love that no-one of the lw commenters seemed to check the irs non-profit database.

i have not enough energy to check if that was mentioned before, but anyways it's a good reminder: the whole cozy enterprise is, indeed, not a registered tax-exempt organisation, and none of the threee nonlinears returned by the irs search engine does seem to have anything in common with the nonlinear dot org.

it's not for the first time this whole ea movement sounds like they're scientologist wannabees either.

i wonder if they realise how thick with internal jargon their language is, and how highly ritualised.