hi marcus :>
froztbyte
ah, my mistake. I guess it was another total bullshit google materials project. easy to confuse those, just like their 734 chat services
tesla: special treatment for those that might cause embarrassing press
gives all the “it works for me” type comments a whole new colour
The materials (and some subtle walkbacks on PR) shit has featured here before too iirc
dogwhistles all the way down
it continues to do my head in that I vacillate on whether there's more insane politics shit for y'all in TNI, or in what we have here in ZA
"embracing cognitive bias" in the "hell yeah I'm down for quadrupling stakes! BRING OUT THE ADDERALL*" sense
(* otherwhere it'd be blackjack, hookers, and blow. but these nerds would get thrown out of such smokey rooms fairly immediately - if they ever even got in)
what, learn from prior art? impossibru. no prior art existed before rationalism! that's taught right on the cult entry brochure!
ah, vibes-based danger diamonds
MSDSs are already dogshit
one of those cases of "minimum legally required" type of things? maybe with a dash of "the specification and requirements were written ${time} ago and haven't evolved a lick since then, despite much shift in industry and progress"?
oh absolutely - part of what's entertaining is that the dipshits don't even seem to realize that (or don't admit it?)
wut