friendlymessage

joined 4 months ago
[–] friendlymessage 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Okay, ich habe dir eine einfache Frage gestellt auf die du nicht antworten willst. Dass die SPD Abgeordneten unter Gefahr für Leib und Leben gegen das Ermächtigungsgesetz gestimmt hat, leugnest du? Weil das ist historischer Fakt und steht im direkten Gegensatz zu deiner Aussage. Nur um das klar zustellen: Deine Aussage ist im Hinblick der historischen Tatsachen nicht weniger als Verhöhnung der Opfer des Nationalsozialismus.

[–] friendlymessage 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Okay, und trotzdem war genau diese Person für genau diese Partei später Kanzler. Und du schuldest mir immer noch eine Erklärung wie sich die SPD bei der Abstimmung über das Ermächtigungsgesetz "wenn es darauf ankommt immer auf die Seite der Monarchie, Authoritarismus und Nationalismus gestellt" hat.

[–] friendlymessage 6 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Sorry, das "immer" ist schlicht unangebracht und historisch falsch. Die SPD hat als einzige Partei gegen das Ermächtigungsgesetz gestimmt, obwohl sie wussten, dass sie persönlich dafür bezahlen werden. Willy Brandt war im Widerstand, viele Sozialdemokraten im KZ

[–] friendlymessage 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Land of the free

[–] friendlymessage 2 points 1 month ago

There are many more examples than just Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan comes to mind but also many other Muslim countries use Islam and Shari'a law to control the population or use religious laws as an excuse for their authoritarianism. No religion is free of that.

[–] friendlymessage 2 points 1 month ago

The Chinese approach is far more effective I fear. The Soviet way worked only with mixed results and was more ideology driven than logical. In Poland, the Catholic Church became a huge factor in the opposition because of that. If religion is deeply rooted in society, controlling and steering religion makes for a powerful tool to control the masses while fighting it automatically makes it a strong opposition force.

[–] friendlymessage 20 points 1 month ago

Of the four ideas that are listed on this picture that's the one you gonna go with for being the worst?

[–] friendlymessage 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Blizzard's Culture of Crunch

One indicative story about early Blizzard's work environment comes from a programmer who didn't fit into the company's crunch-heavy culture. The programmer tells Schreier that after he complained about not getting paid for overtime, he became "the target of endless bullying around the office." He says he began to be dismissed, derided, or simply ignored.

"So many people were shitty to me, I have to assume I brought it on myself in some way," the programmer says. He admits to making mistakes, but says that there was also no one willing to offer mentorship or training. After less than a year on the job, the programmer was fired. "This was a dream job for me, working at Blizzard," the programmer said. "I was absolutely crushed."

In the end the programmer, whose name is Andy Weir, pursued other dreams. He wrote The Martian and Project Hail Mary. 4

[–] friendlymessage 21 points 1 month ago
[–] friendlymessage 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A desk reject, also known as a desk rejection, is when your paper is turned down by a journal or conference, prior to them sending it out for review. It basically means: either your paper is rejected for technical reasons (i.e., not within the page limits or clearly written by AI) or it's so shitty, nobody wants to waste the reviewer's time.

[–] friendlymessage 10 points 1 month ago

Ich glaube, das sollte eher den Kontrast zeigen zu Zeiten als die FDP noch was sinnvolles vorzuweisen hatte. Dass ausgerechnet diese Partei jetzt plötzlich auf Law & Order macht, zeugt von Verzweiflung und Werteverlust.

[–] friendlymessage 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Actually, it looks delicious

view more: ‹ prev next ›