TowardsTheFuture

joined 1 year ago
[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not saying money is the sole decider, but it helps. Also the difference between what you can donate to a candidate (like $3000) and what you can donate to the DNC (like $40000) is… quite large. Like 12x the amount of money… Kamala does not have 12x the amount of money as trump.

Also, you really think there’s just like… two blocks of voters in the primaries… and they’re exactly equal in number, and exactly spread evenly between all states and districts? Progressive/leftist/whatever you wanna call the “far left” makes up a fairly small amount, but one that literally turns out in higher percent than any other voting block. It does not mean they outnumber EVERYONE ELSE COMBINED.

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/01/05/americans-at-the-ends-of-the-ideological-spectrum-are-the-most-active-in-national-politics/

Here’s some data from Pew Research on it. You can look for some others they’ve done on similar stuff.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Yeah dude idk if you understand politics at all, so there are people. And those people get informed. Often by ads. And you see, the Clinton campaign was skirting campaign finance law by funneling money through the DNC and then taking that money for her campaign to run attack ads against a primary opponent when that money was promised to states and to whoever won the primary.

So yes, the person who won broke the law in order to gain the upper hand to win but it’s our fault for not voting harderer. So many of yall DNC worshipers think it’s all the progressives don’t vote, or only vote in the presidential elections, meanwhile they literally turn out way higher than any other block of voters in EVERY election.

The problem is money. Literally so much money they had to illegally funnel it through the DNC instead of a single campaign to gain that money.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

Yes. Also if you think of i as a 90° rotation (with a length of the scalar coefficient infront of i, in this case 1) . Thus one rotates you outwards away from the 2D plane, and two of those gets you back to the 2D plane, just going the other direction.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Hell yeah when are we getting carefree life long contracts baby.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

As someone who doesn’t Star Trek I absolutely assumed this just was a sealab meme someone made into Star Trek

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

To be fair I think The Yellow Wallpaper at least has a fucking point instead of … what the fuck…

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

Ah yes, a nice short story about yellow wallpaper.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 49 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I wish it was e, so it could be true.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 weeks ago

I mean I wasn’t particularly serious it’s more about the DNC even having anything close to that as policy which would be nice but they won’t.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Just man up and nationalize all major forms of insurance you fucker.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, the genocide is for expansion. They want Palestinians dead to take their land. There are forms of expansion other than occupying land: colonies and such, as I doubt they do actually expand physically that far.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Neither do Britain and India… or Britain and Palestine… nor… a lot of places imperialism has sprawled to. To assume they stop the genocide at Palestine is silly.

view more: next ›