You realize that it takes money and workers to upkeep, repair, rebuild plants? Staying with nuclear costs money that instead is better invested in renewables. And you realize that maintaining that share against newly build renewables requires new plants right?
You understand that 20% of 100 are 20 and 20% of 200 are 40 right? Like when you look at the charts, you see that the total production capacity doubled, because of the exponential growth of renewables. So it would need new plants to maintain the share.
So unless the plants you demanded were already in planning in 1990, there is no way they would have been there in 2010. Seriously, with how bad at math and physics the proponents of nuclear power are it is all the more important to keep them away from such a dangerous technology.
Wohl eher warum Medienkompetenz wichtig ist. Die Daten sind ohne absolute Zahlen völlig unbrauchbar. Wenn gestern 10 Leute und heute 100 Leute etwas bei google suchen, ist das zwar ein Anstieg um 1000% aber in einem Land mit übet dreihundert Millionen Menschen sicher kein Trend.
Nur weil man sich wünscht, dass es wahr ist, sollte man trotzdem nicht alle Vorsicht fahren lassen.