feddit.org

1,601 readers
537 users here now

Matrix Raum
Matrix Space

Static Badge

Wir sind eine deutsch- und englischsprachige Lemmy Community und entwickelten uns aus feddit.de heraus.

Feddit.org dient als Reddit-Alternative im Fediverse.

Wir sehen uns als einen selbstbestimmten Raum, außerhalb der Kontrolle kommerzieller Tech-Unternehmen.

Netiquette wird vorausgesetzt. Gepflegt wird ein respektvoller Umgang - ohne Hass, Hetze, Diskriminierung.

Alternative Oberflächen:

Werden euch Posts/Kommentare nicht angezeigt?

Diese Community ist spendenfinanziert und wird von der Fediverse Foundation unterstützt.

Serverregeln

Wir tolerieren kein diskriminierendes Verhalten und keine Inhalte, die die Unterdrückung von Mitgliedern marginalisierter Gruppen fördern oder befürworten. Diese Gruppen können durch eine der folgenden Eigenschaften gekennzeichnet sein (obwohl diese Liste natürlich unvollständig ist):

  • ethnische Zugehörigkeit
  • Geschlechtsidentität oder Ausdruck
  • sexuelle Identität oder Ausdruck
  • körperliche Merkmale oder Alter
  • Behinderung oder Krankheit
  • Nationalität, Wohnsitz, Staatsbürgerschaft
  • Reichtum oder Bildung
  • Religionszugehörigkeit, Agnostizismus oder Atheismus

Wir tolerieren kein bedrohliches Verhalten, Stalking und Doxxing. Wir tolerieren keine Belästigungen, einschließlich Brigading, Dogpiling oder jede andere Form des Kontakts mit einem Benutzer, der erklärt hat, dass er nicht kontaktiert werden möchte.

  • Sei respektvoll. Alle sind hier willkommen.
  • Kein Rassismus, Sexismus, Ableismus, Homophobie, oder anderweitige Xenophobie
  • Wir tolerieren kein Mobbing, einschließlich Beschimpfungen, absichtliches Misgendering oder Deadnaming.
  • Wir dulden keine gewalttätige nationalistische Propaganda, Nazisymbolik oder die Förderung der Ideologie des Nationalsozialismus.
  • Aktionen, die diese Instanz oder ihre Leistung beschädigen sollen, können zur sofortigen Sperrung des Kontos führen.
  • Provokationen können nach Ermessen der Moderation entfernt werden
  • Toxisches Verhalten wird nicht geduldet
  • Keine Werbung
  • Kein Spam
  • Keine Pornografie / Adult Content
  • In Deutschland, Österreich oder Schweiz illegale Inhalte werden gelöscht und können zur sofortigen Sperrung des Accounts führen.

AttributionThis text was partly adapted and modified from chaos.social. It is free to be adapted and remixed under the terms of the CC-BY (Attribution 4.0 International) license.

 
Datenschutzerklärung

TOM


Matrix Room
Matrix Space

We are a German and English-speaking Lemmy community that evolved from feddit.de.

Feddit.org serves as a Reddit alternative in the Fediverse.

We see ourselves as a self-determined space, outside the control of commercial tech companies.

Netiquette is expected. A respectful interaction is maintained - without hate, harassment, discrimination.

Alternative UIs:

Are you missing posts/comments?

Serverrules

We do not tolerate discriminatory behavior or content that promotes or advocates the oppression of members of marginalized groups. These groups may be characterized by any of the following (though this list is of course incomplete):

  • ethnicity
  • gender identity or expression
  • sexual identity or expression
  • physical characteristics or age
  • disability or illness
  • nationality, residency, citizenship
  • wealth or education
  • religious affiliation, agnosticism, or atheism

We do not tolerate threatening behavior, stalking, and doxxing. We do not tolerate harassment, including brigading, dogpiling, or any other form of contact with a user who has stated that they do not wish to be contacted.

  • Be respectful. Everyone is welcome here.
  • No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, or other xenophobia
  • We do not tolerate bullying, including name-calling, intentional misgendering, or deadnaming.
  • We do not tolerate violent nationalist propaganda, Nazi symbolism or the promotion of the ideology of National Socialism.
  • Actions intended to damage this instance or its performance can lead to immediate blocking of the account.
  • Provocations can be removed at the discretion of the moderators
  • Toxic behavior will not be tolerated
  • No advertising
  • No spam
  • No pornography / adult content
  • Content that is illegal in Germany, Austria or Switzerland will be deleted and can lead to an immediate ban of the account.

AttributionThis text was partly adapted and modified from chaos.social. It is free to be adapted and remixed under the terms of the CC-BY (Attribution 4.0 International) license.

 
Data-Protection-Policy

TOM

This community is powered by donations and supported by Fediverse Foundation.

Static Badge

founded 3 months ago
ADMINS
2
 
 

The judges agreed, until the conservatives sought to include an additional proposition that mandated anyone seeking to enforce the Constitution’s ban on insurrectionist candidates get congressional approval. Four justices—Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, and Amy Coney Barrett—thought that idea went too far, and wrote concurrences in disagreement. Roberts himself wrote the majority opinion.

Roberts also took charge of the court’s ruling that declared the government went too far in charging those who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6.

He had initially assigned the case to Samuel Alito but abruptly took it over himself days after the Times revealed Alito’s wife Martha-Ann hung an upside-down U.S. flag—an emblem of the “Stop the Steal” movement, and propagated by some Jan. 6 rioters—outside his home, according to the Times. It was unclear whether the two episodes were linked; none of the justices answered the Times’ questions

1
 
 

The Supreme Court was hit by a flurry of damaging new leaks Sunday as a series of confidential memos written by the chief justice were revealed by The New York Times.

The court’s Chief Justice John Roberts was clear to his fellow justices in February: He wanted the court to take up a case weighing Donald Trump’s right to presidential immunity—and he seemed inclined to protect the former president.

“I think it likely that we will view the separation of powers analysis differently,” Roberts wrote to his Supreme Court peers, according to a private memo obtained by the *Times. *He was referencing the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision to allow the case to move forward.

Roberts took an unusual level of involvement in this and other cases that ultimately benefited Trump, according to the Times— his handling of the cases surprised even some other justices on the high court, across ideological lines. As president, Trump appointed three of the members of its current conservative supermajority.

view more: next ›