feddit.org

1,484 readers
469 users here now

Matrix Raum
Matrix Space

Static Badge

Wir sind eine deutsch- und englischsprachige Lemmy Community und entwickelten uns aus feddit.de heraus.

Feddit.org dient als Reddit-Alternative im Fediverse.

Wir sehen uns als einen selbstbestimmten Raum, außerhalb der Kontrolle kommerzieller Tech-Unternehmen.

Netiquette wird vorausgesetzt. Gepflegt wird ein respektvoller Umgang - ohne Hass, Hetze, Diskriminierung.

Alternative Oberflächen:

Werden euch Posts/Kommentare nicht angezeigt?

Diese Community ist spendenfinanziert und wird von der Fediverse Foundation unterstützt.

Serverregeln

Wir tolerieren kein diskriminierendes Verhalten und keine Inhalte, die die Unterdrückung von Mitgliedern marginalisierter Gruppen fördern oder befürworten. Diese Gruppen können durch eine der folgenden Eigenschaften gekennzeichnet sein (obwohl diese Liste natürlich unvollständig ist):

  • ethnische Zugehörigkeit
  • Geschlechtsidentität oder Ausdruck
  • sexuelle Identität oder Ausdruck
  • körperliche Merkmale oder Alter
  • Behinderung oder Krankheit
  • Nationalität, Wohnsitz, Staatsbürgerschaft
  • Reichtum oder Bildung
  • Religionszugehörigkeit, Agnostizismus oder Atheismus

Wir tolerieren kein bedrohliches Verhalten, Stalking und Doxxing. Wir tolerieren keine Belästigungen, einschließlich Brigading, Dogpiling oder jede andere Form des Kontakts mit einem Benutzer, der erklärt hat, dass er nicht kontaktiert werden möchte.

  • Sei respektvoll. Alle sind hier willkommen.
  • Kein Rassismus, Sexismus, Ableismus, Homophobie, oder anderweitige Xenophobie
  • Wir tolerieren kein Mobbing, einschließlich Beschimpfungen, absichtliches Misgendering oder Deadnaming.
  • Wir dulden keine gewalttätige nationalistische Propaganda, Nazisymbolik oder die Förderung der Ideologie des Nationalsozialismus.
  • Aktionen, die diese Instanz oder ihre Leistung beschädigen sollen, können zur sofortigen Sperrung des Kontos führen.
  • Provokationen können nach Ermessen der Moderation entfernt werden
  • Toxisches Verhalten wird nicht geduldet
  • Keine Werbung
  • Kein Spam
  • Keine Pornografie / Adult Content
  • In Deutschland, Österreich oder Schweiz illegale Inhalte werden gelöscht und können zur sofortigen Sperrung des Accounts führen.

AttributionThis text was partly adapted and modified from chaos.social. It is free to be adapted and remixed under the terms of the CC-BY (Attribution 4.0 International) license.

 
Datenschutzerklärung

TOM

Matrix Room
Matrix Space

We are a German and English-speaking Lemmy community that evolved from feddit.de.

Feddit.org serves as a Reddit alternative in the Fediverse.

We see ourselves as a self-determined space, outside the control of commercial tech companies.

Netiquette is expected. A respectful interaction is maintained - without hate, harassment, discrimination.

Alternative UIs:

Are you missing posts/comments?

Serverrules

We do not tolerate discriminatory behavior or content that promotes or advocates the oppression of members of marginalized groups. These groups may be characterized by any of the following (though this list is of course incomplete):

  • ethnicity
  • gender identity or expression
  • sexual identity or expression
  • physical characteristics or age
  • disability or illness
  • nationality, residency, citizenship
  • wealth or education
  • religious affiliation, agnosticism, or atheism

We do not tolerate threatening behavior, stalking, and doxxing. We do not tolerate harassment, including brigading, dogpiling, or any other form of contact with a user who has stated that they do not wish to be contacted.

  • Be respectful. Everyone is welcome here.
  • No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, or other xenophobia
  • We do not tolerate bullying, including name-calling, intentional misgendering, or deadnaming.
  • We do not tolerate violent nationalist propaganda, Nazi symbolism or the promotion of the ideology of National Socialism.
  • Actions intended to damage this instance or its performance can lead to immediate blocking of the account.
  • Provocations can be removed at the discretion of the moderators
  • Toxic behavior will not be tolerated
  • No advertising
  • No spam
  • No pornography / adult content
  • Content that is illegal in Germany, Austria or Switzerland will be deleted and can lead to an immediate ban of the account.

AttributionThis text was partly adapted and modified from chaos.social. It is free to be adapted and remixed under the terms of the CC-BY (Attribution 4.0 International) license.

 
Data-Protection-Policy

TOM

This community is powered by donations and supported by Fediverse Foundation.

Static Badge

founded 2 months ago
ADMINS
admin
letsu
BurningTurtle
surprised_pikachu
listing: all - local
search
1
68
South China Sea: Chinese academics urged to ‘construct narratives’ to defend maritime claims by China (www.scmp.com)
 
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/309474

Archived link

Addition for clarification: The "South China Morning Post"(SCMP) is a state-controlled Chinese media outlet. Sometimes they appear to publish articles like this one that are, at least to some degree, critical of the CCP, although the article increasingly reiterates the CCP's stance as you read along. The post provides a rare glimpse into the Chinese propaganda machinery, however, which is why I posted it here. In general, however, one should be very careful using this source.

  • “Narrative construction and discourse building are essential if we are to effectively defend our rights and interests in the South China Sea – both in the present and in future,” Wu Shicun, founder of the National Institute for South China Sea Studies, told a seminar held in Hainan province last week.

  • Without naming any country, Wu said China faced “an increasingly arduous battle over public perception and opinion”, adding that “rival claimants” were “stepping up cooperation with extraterritorial forces in the study of historical and legal issues” concerning the South China Sea.

  • Beijing lays claim to much of the South China Sea, citing historic activities and records in support.

  • Its claims were rejected by the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague in 2016 in a case filed by the Philippines.

  • Beijing has dismissed the Hague ruling as “null and void” and continued to build up its infrastructure and troop presence in the South China Sea. But the Philippines and other claimants – which include Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei – along with the United States and its allies have repeatedly urged China to abide by international law.

  • Yi Xianliang, a former ambassador to Norway who previously served as deputy director of the foreign ministry’s boundary and ocean affairs department, also spoke at Tuesday’s seminar and dismissed the 2016 ruling as a “bad joke”.

  • But Yi warned “we have to ask why the ruling is flawed” and ask if it “will happen again and how we can prevent it from happening again”.

2
1
South China Sea: Chinese academics urged to ‘construct narratives’ to defend maritime claims by China (www.scmp.com)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by 0x815 to c/globalnews@lemmy.zip
1 comments fedilink
 
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/309474

Archived link

Addition for clarification: The "South China Morning Post"(SCMP) is a state-controlled Chinese media outlet. Sometimes they appear to publish articles like this one that are, at least to some degree, critical of the CCP, although the article increasingly reiterates the CCP's stance as you read along. The post provides a rare glimpse into the Chinese propaganda machinery, however, which is why I posted it here. In general, however, one should be very careful using this source.

  • “Narrative construction and discourse building are essential if we are to effectively defend our rights and interests in the South China Sea – both in the present and in future,” Wu Shicun, founder of the National Institute for South China Sea Studies, told a seminar held in Hainan province last week.

  • Without naming any country, Wu said China faced “an increasingly arduous battle over public perception and opinion”, adding that “rival claimants” were “stepping up cooperation with extraterritorial forces in the study of historical and legal issues” concerning the South China Sea.

  • Beijing lays claim to much of the South China Sea, citing historic activities and records in support.

  • Its claims were rejected by the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague in 2016 in a case filed by the Philippines.

  • Beijing has dismissed the Hague ruling as “null and void” and continued to build up its infrastructure and troop presence in the South China Sea. But the Philippines and other claimants – which include Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei – along with the United States and its allies have repeatedly urged China to abide by international law.

  • Yi Xianliang, a former ambassador to Norway who previously served as deputy director of the foreign ministry’s boundary and ocean affairs department, also spoke at Tuesday’s seminar and dismissed the 2016 ruling as a “bad joke”.

  • But Yi warned “we have to ask why the ruling is flawed” and ask if it “will happen again and how we can prevent it from happening again”.

3
2
South China Sea: Chinese academics urged to ‘construct narratives’ to defend maritime claims by China (www.scmp.com)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by 0x815 to c/news@beehaw.org
0 comments fedilink
 
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/309474

Archived link

Addition for clarification: The "South China Morning Post"(SCMP) is a state-controlled Chinese media outlet. Sometimes they appear to publish articles like this one that are, at least to some degree, critical of the CCP, although the article increasingly reiterates the CCP's stance as you read along. The post provides a rare glimpse into the Chinese propaganda machinery, however, which is why I posted it here. In general, however, one should be very careful using this source.

  • “Narrative construction and discourse building are essential if we are to effectively defend our rights and interests in the South China Sea – both in the present and in future,” Wu Shicun, founder of the National Institute for South China Sea Studies, told a seminar held in Hainan province last week.

  • Without naming any country, Wu said China faced “an increasingly arduous battle over public perception and opinion”, adding that “rival claimants” were “stepping up cooperation with extraterritorial forces in the study of historical and legal issues” concerning the South China Sea.

  • Beijing lays claim to much of the South China Sea, citing historic activities and records in support.

  • Its claims were rejected by the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague in 2016 in a case filed by the Philippines.

  • Beijing has dismissed the Hague ruling as “null and void” and continued to build up its infrastructure and troop presence in the South China Sea. But the Philippines and other claimants – which include Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei – along with the United States and its allies have repeatedly urged China to abide by international law.

  • Yi Xianliang, a former ambassador to Norway who previously served as deputy director of the foreign ministry’s boundary and ocean affairs department, also spoke at Tuesday’s seminar and dismissed the 2016 ruling as a “bad joke”.

  • But Yi warned “we have to ask why the ruling is flawed” and ask if it “will happen again and how we can prevent it from happening again”.

4
100
South China Sea: Chinese academics urged to ‘construct narratives’ to defend maritime claims by China (www.scmp.com)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by 0x815 to c/news@lemmy.world
14 comments fedilink
 
 

Archived link

Addition for clarification: The "South China Morning Post"(SCMP) is a state-controlled Chinese media outlet. Sometimes they appear to publish articles like this one that are, at least to some degree, critical of the CCP, although the article increasingly reiterates the CCP's stance as you read along. The post provides a rare glimpse into the Chinese propaganda machinery, however, which is why I posted it here. In general, however, one should be very careful using this source.

  • “Narrative construction and discourse building are essential if we are to effectively defend our rights and interests in the South China Sea – both in the present and in future,” Wu Shicun, founder of the National Institute for South China Sea Studies, told a seminar held in Hainan province last week.

  • Without naming any country, Wu said China faced “an increasingly arduous battle over public perception and opinion”, adding that “rival claimants” were “stepping up cooperation with extraterritorial forces in the study of historical and legal issues” concerning the South China Sea.

  • Beijing lays claim to much of the South China Sea, citing historic activities and records in support.

  • Its claims were rejected by the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague in 2016 in a case filed by the Philippines.

  • Beijing has dismissed the Hague ruling as “null and void” and continued to build up its infrastructure and troop presence in the South China Sea. But the Philippines and other claimants – which include Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei – along with the United States and its allies have repeatedly urged China to abide by international law.

  • Yi Xianliang, a former ambassador to Norway who previously served as deputy director of the foreign ministry’s boundary and ocean affairs department, also spoke at Tuesday’s seminar and dismissed the 2016 ruling as a “bad joke”.

  • But Yi warned “we have to ask why the ruling is flawed” and ask if it “will happen again and how we can prevent it from happening again”.

view more: next ›