feddit.org

1,573 readers
516 users here now

Matrix Raum
Matrix Space

Static Badge

Wir sind eine deutsch- und englischsprachige Lemmy Community und entwickelten uns aus feddit.de heraus.

Feddit.org dient als Reddit-Alternative im Fediverse.

Wir sehen uns als einen selbstbestimmten Raum, außerhalb der Kontrolle kommerzieller Tech-Unternehmen.

Netiquette wird vorausgesetzt. Gepflegt wird ein respektvoller Umgang - ohne Hass, Hetze, Diskriminierung.

Alternative Oberflächen:

Werden euch Posts/Kommentare nicht angezeigt?

Diese Community ist spendenfinanziert und wird von der Fediverse Foundation unterstützt.

Serverregeln

Wir tolerieren kein diskriminierendes Verhalten und keine Inhalte, die die Unterdrückung von Mitgliedern marginalisierter Gruppen fördern oder befürworten. Diese Gruppen können durch eine der folgenden Eigenschaften gekennzeichnet sein (obwohl diese Liste natürlich unvollständig ist):

  • ethnische Zugehörigkeit
  • Geschlechtsidentität oder Ausdruck
  • sexuelle Identität oder Ausdruck
  • körperliche Merkmale oder Alter
  • Behinderung oder Krankheit
  • Nationalität, Wohnsitz, Staatsbürgerschaft
  • Reichtum oder Bildung
  • Religionszugehörigkeit, Agnostizismus oder Atheismus

Wir tolerieren kein bedrohliches Verhalten, Stalking und Doxxing. Wir tolerieren keine Belästigungen, einschließlich Brigading, Dogpiling oder jede andere Form des Kontakts mit einem Benutzer, der erklärt hat, dass er nicht kontaktiert werden möchte.

  • Sei respektvoll. Alle sind hier willkommen.
  • Kein Rassismus, Sexismus, Ableismus, Homophobie, oder anderweitige Xenophobie
  • Wir tolerieren kein Mobbing, einschließlich Beschimpfungen, absichtliches Misgendering oder Deadnaming.
  • Wir dulden keine gewalttätige nationalistische Propaganda, Nazisymbolik oder die Förderung der Ideologie des Nationalsozialismus.
  • Aktionen, die diese Instanz oder ihre Leistung beschädigen sollen, können zur sofortigen Sperrung des Kontos führen.
  • Provokationen können nach Ermessen der Moderation entfernt werden
  • Toxisches Verhalten wird nicht geduldet
  • Keine Werbung
  • Kein Spam
  • Keine Pornografie / Adult Content
  • In Deutschland, Österreich oder Schweiz illegale Inhalte werden gelöscht und können zur sofortigen Sperrung des Accounts führen.

AttributionThis text was partly adapted and modified from chaos.social. It is free to be adapted and remixed under the terms of the CC-BY (Attribution 4.0 International) license.

 
Datenschutzerklärung

TOM


Matrix Room
Matrix Space

We are a German and English-speaking Lemmy community that evolved from feddit.de.

Feddit.org serves as a Reddit alternative in the Fediverse.

We see ourselves as a self-determined space, outside the control of commercial tech companies.

Netiquette is expected. A respectful interaction is maintained - without hate, harassment, discrimination.

Alternative UIs:

Are you missing posts/comments?

Serverrules

We do not tolerate discriminatory behavior or content that promotes or advocates the oppression of members of marginalized groups. These groups may be characterized by any of the following (though this list is of course incomplete):

  • ethnicity
  • gender identity or expression
  • sexual identity or expression
  • physical characteristics or age
  • disability or illness
  • nationality, residency, citizenship
  • wealth or education
  • religious affiliation, agnosticism, or atheism

We do not tolerate threatening behavior, stalking, and doxxing. We do not tolerate harassment, including brigading, dogpiling, or any other form of contact with a user who has stated that they do not wish to be contacted.

  • Be respectful. Everyone is welcome here.
  • No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, or other xenophobia
  • We do not tolerate bullying, including name-calling, intentional misgendering, or deadnaming.
  • We do not tolerate violent nationalist propaganda, Nazi symbolism or the promotion of the ideology of National Socialism.
  • Actions intended to damage this instance or its performance can lead to immediate blocking of the account.
  • Provocations can be removed at the discretion of the moderators
  • Toxic behavior will not be tolerated
  • No advertising
  • No spam
  • No pornography / adult content
  • Content that is illegal in Germany, Austria or Switzerland will be deleted and can lead to an immediate ban of the account.

AttributionThis text was partly adapted and modified from chaos.social. It is free to be adapted and remixed under the terms of the CC-BY (Attribution 4.0 International) license.

 
Data-Protection-Policy

TOM

This community is powered by donations and supported by Fediverse Foundation.

Static Badge

founded 2 months ago
ADMINS
1
 
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/4664992

~~(the audio associated to the link will air on BBC World Service again in a couple hours from now [20:00 GMT today], if anyone is on a strained internet uplink)~~ (that’s in the past now)

A panel of climate experts answered questions related to #COP28. Someone asked about the viability of an agenda to get people off animal products. IIRC, the answers basically boiled down to:

  • An elected politician telling people not to eat meat would be political suicide
  • Nutrition would be a problem

IMO both answers are accurate. But isn’t there an oversight in terms of subsidies? The US gives huge subsidies to farmers and that includes livestock subsidies (not sure about other countries). A politician would not get away with intervening in people’s diets but canceling livestock subsidies would not be an intervention - it would actually be non-intervention. Would that still necessarily be political suicide?

W.r.t nutrition, someone who works 2 jobs and struggles for a survivable income would not have time/resources to study avoiding malnutrition on a strictly plant-based diet. So if animal products were priced out of the market for poor people, it would cause real problems, no?

Would it make sense to cut the subsidies, let animal product prices skyrocket, but then put the subsidies on the consumer side so overworked underpaid workers could maintain their diets? Apart from that, it seems a bit shitty that vegan taxpayers still finance animal exploitation by simply paying their tax.

Are there any states/countries known to not subsidize animal exploitation, where vegans can be vegan in the most absolute sense?

2
 
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/4664992

~~(the audio associated to the link will air on BBC World Service again in a couple hours from now [20:00 GMT today], if anyone is on a strained internet uplink)~~ (that’s in the past now)

A panel of climate experts answered questions related to #COP28. Someone asked about the viability of an agenda to get people off animal products. IIRC, the answers basically boiled down to:

  • An elected politician telling people not to eat meat would be political suicide
  • Nutrition would be a problem

IMO both answers are accurate. But isn’t there an oversight in terms of subsidies? The US gives huge subsidies to farmers and that includes livestock subsidies (not sure about other countries). A politician would not get away with intervening in people’s diets but canceling livestock subsidies would not be an intervention - it would actually be non-intervention. Would that still necessarily be political suicide?

W.r.t nutrition, someone who works 2 jobs and struggles for a survivable income would not have time/resources to study avoiding malnutrition on a strictly plant-based diet. So if animal products were priced out of the market for poor people, it would cause real problems, no?

Would it make sense to cut the subsidies, let animal product prices skyrocket, but then put the subsidies on the consumer side so overworked underpaid workers could maintain their diets? Apart from that, it seems a bit shitty that vegan taxpayers still finance animal exploitation by simply paying their tax.

Are there any states/countries known to not subsidize animal exploitation, where vegans can be vegan in the most absolute sense?

3
 
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/4664992

(the audio associated to the link will air on BBC World Service again in a couple hours from now [20:00 GMT today], if anyone is on a strained internet uplink)

A panel of climate experts answered questions related to #COP28. Someone asked about the viability of an agenda to get people off animal products. IIRC, the answers basically boiled down to:

  • An elected politician telling people not to eat meat would be political suicide
  • Nutrition would be a problem

IMO both answers are accurate. But isn’t there an oversight in terms of subsidies? The US gives huge subsidies to farmers and that includes livestock subsidies (not sure about other countries). A politician would not get away with intervening in people’s diets but canceling livestock subsidies would not be an intervention - it would actually be non-intervention. Would that still necessarily be political suicide?

W.r.t nutrition, someone who works 2 jobs and struggles for a survivable income would not have time/resources to study avoiding malnutrition on a strictly plant-based diet. So if animal products were priced out of the market for poor people, it would cause real problems, no?

Would it make sense to cut the subsidies, let animal product prices skyrocket, but then put the subsidies on the consumer side so overworked underpaid workers could maintain their diets? Apart from that, it seems a bit shitty that vegan taxpayers still finance animal exploitation by simply paying their tax.

Are there any states/countries known to not subsidize animal exploitation, where vegans can be vegan in the most absolute sense?

view more: next ›