this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
363 points (97.6% liked)

News

23367 readers
3103 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic lawmakers hailed President Joe Biden’s historic decision on Sunday not to seek reelection, praising him as putting his country and his party before himself. Republicans called on him to resign from office, saying that if he could not run for another term, office, then he’s unable to serve as president.

Biden’s announcement came after more than two weeks of Democrats urging him to withdraw from the race. Nearly three dozen lawmakers had publicly called on him to end his reelection bid. Others had voiced concerns privately about what the ramifications would be for down-ballot Democrats if he remained in the race. When the president heeded those concerns, Democrats called it a selfless move.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 201 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Who cares what the Republikkkans say?

[–] Plum@lemmy.world 63 points 4 months ago

Putting equal emphasis on the opinions of both sides is what got us in this fuckhole to begin with. No matter how niche a voice, your opinion matters equal on any and all topics including reproductive health and climate mechanics.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 171 points 4 months ago (4 children)

"That 81 year old is way too old for the job, vote for our 78 year old!" is a bold strategy

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 22 points 4 months ago

Especially when he'll be older in 2028 than Biden is now.

Although I'll wager the job is harder on Biden than it is on Trump, on the grounds that Trump doesn't actually bother to do it. He just played golf and signed shit for other people without looking at it.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 22 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That’s the best part. Why is trump even running… he looks so tired.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

Because his options literally are win or go to jail

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 105 points 4 months ago (11 children)

Do Republicans just want to destabilize the country until it’s destroyed?

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 106 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Literally yes. That is fascism. Palingenetic ultranationalism.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 18 points 4 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DmMacniel 75 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

destroy it and then rebuild it according project 2025, sounds on brand.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 47 points 4 months ago

I don’t think they want to put the time or effort into rebuilding anything.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 45 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The Koch brother's plan was to invest in state races to win enough legislatures and governors to call a new constitutional convention, and have enough anarcho-capitalist stooges to formally reshape the country as their libertarian oligarchy utopia where the rest of us are just indentured serfs.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago

Yeah bro, where you been?

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

They just want to destabilize it until they can steal power, but if anything gets destroyed along the way they'll just blame the libs

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 25 points 4 months ago
[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 months ago

Since Nixon

[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Conservatives will turn to authoritarianism when democracy doesn't work for them.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

They did that a long time ago so why are you phrasing this like it's a future transition?

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Yes they do.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

A bunch of small to midsized private company owners want to destabilize the federal government so that they only have to deal with state level regulations. These are the types of companies that you have never heard of or didn't realize they weren't publicly traded.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 67 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Republicans were calling for President Elect Biden to resign even while their leader was staging a violent coup to end the Republic.

The fascist GOP can get fucked. What they want should be irrelevant and their very presence opposed.

[–] ImpressiveEssay@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

From a foreigner, this is undoubtedly true, unless you goal is secretly to have a king.

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Given our Supreme Court ruling that a US president can't commit crimes, they're not being very secret about their goal of making the US a dictatorship.

[–] ImpressiveEssay@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

None of it... Is secret... The trump calls. Even to the fucking election investigator in Georgia!? The paperwork.

It's all there. Any American who supports trump today is either literally special needs level education (and haven't looked at or understood thr tapes) or publicly admitting they would prefer monarchy with trump.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sad when non-Americans seem to understand the severity of this threat better than people here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VanillaBean@lemmy.world 62 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

I hope biden passes a few 'Official Acts' before he heads out.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 55 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Unless he resigns, he’s still president until January 20, 2025. So we will see; he’s got nothing to lose, AND presidential immunity.

Usually I’d say someone in his position has absolutely nothing to lose, but being he’s such a … typical guy, he won’t do anything and go down in history as a footnote.

[–] Kroxx@lemm.ee 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Well if Harris is running couldn't any unpopular thing that Biden does potentially be tied to her?

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 15 points 4 months ago

Repeat after me: “I condemn President Biden dropping Clarence Thomas into a dildo shredder, but I respect the supreme court decision of total presidential immunity.”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brianary@startrek.website 31 points 4 months ago

Like sending a few choice SCOTUS judges to gitmo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 45 points 4 months ago

The republicans want Biden to resign so they can immediately attack Harris for simutaneously having no record and attack anything she attempts to accomplish.

[–] spirinolas@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago

If Joe Biden resigned the republicans would say "not enough! You have to commit sepukku on live TV! COWARD!"

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago (11 children)

If he had resigned that would have put in Harris as the incumbent and given her a big boost. Do they really want that?

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 45 points 4 months ago

They're flinging bad faith criticisms at the wall and seeing what sticks, they haven't thought that far ahead

[–] superkret 13 points 4 months ago

They are currently in the position to force through their pick of a VP.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So Republicans want to make Harris the first woman president asap? How progressive of them.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If she takes over now, and them beats Trump, would that count as her first term or second? Does it have to be a whole term to count?

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 17 points 4 months ago

If Biden were to resign (which he won’t), then she would assume the presidency as kind of zero-ith term; she could run for reelection twice. Two full terms.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

For what purpose? Basically the same thing happened in the 1960s with Lyndon B. Johnson. For purposes of not being allowed to be elected more than twice, she would be eligible to run once more because of the text of the 22nd amendment ("and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once"). We are considerably less than two years away from the end of Biden's term.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] supercriticalcheese@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

Speaker Mike Johnson is not fit to be a speaker, so there who cares ?

[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 18 points 4 months ago

Yeah I bet the want him to resign. Untethered by reelection he might actually do something they don’t like.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You can't satisfy it Republicans so don't bother trying. Well, unless you use Grindr during the RNC. Then you can probably satisfy Republicans.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 7 points 4 months ago

You couldn't pay me enough to fuck someone who gets on stage and tells everyone that their neighbors and people like me shouldn't exist.

You have to be nicer and more friendly than that.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If Biden where to step down now, and Harris takes over till elections. Does that count as her first term?

It would allow her to campaign as incumbent. Although not having the office does mean more time.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I believe you can still run for two full terms if you were president for less than two years. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 months ago

You are correct

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

No. Interm president does not count toward elected presidential terms afaik

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Two years is the limit. You can be president for up to 10 years. 2 filing out the previous term and 8 being elected to the office twice.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›