this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
409 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2557 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 93 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I’d put a bid in for that seat.

I bet it smells like a harbor at low tide.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 39 points 5 months ago

Never change, SatansMaggotyCumFart. Always be the reason my eyeballs burn.

[–] MrPibb@lemmynsfw.com 23 points 5 months ago

lol. Gross. But lol.

[–] Eliteguardians@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

We are a well oiled machine haha

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago
[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 42 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You could go more petty than this, but this is plenty

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Do you think Boebert wouldn't do exactly the same thing?

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Like pay for the actors in the beetlejuice to reenact bobert and then act out her losing the campaign?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 29 points 5 months ago (2 children)

If Boebert goes down for being a bit of a slag instead of for being a fascist I won't be surprised at America, but I will be disappointed yet again.

Stop slutshaming fascists and just throw bricks at them, that's all I want, why is this so hard :(

[–] match@pawb.social 11 points 5 months ago

Forcing other people who didn't consent to watch your public handjob isn't a slut thing, sluts love consent. Fascists, however, don't value consent, and we hate that about them

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Mmmm I agree in principal, but you need to keep in mind that the ones who elected her into office are also fascists, or at least fascism supporters. They don’t care that she’s a fascist. But they claim to care about actions like the ones that took place there.

The only way she’s losing support from her constituents is for the non-fascist things she does.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Dems really need to bump up their shit flinging game if they want to stay competitive.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Beware Bobo, she got the fastest hands in the West.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Beetlebert is such a joke. She was a joke even before her vaping gropefest at Beetlejuice. Anyway, it would be fantastic if Empty G were to be caught in something similarly embarrassing.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

That is pretty funny.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Its very funny and she deserves to have her cringe habits paraded around in front of the general public.

But its fucking crazy she is a sitting Congresswoman to begin with. Sort of sad that this needs to be the nail in her coffin and not her atrocious politics or her abysmal non-jerk-off-in-movie-theaters behaviors.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Colorado Republican Rep Lauren Boebert’s Democratic rival posted a hilarious new ad speaking from the lawmaker’s seat during her scandalous Beetlejuice outing last fall.

Democratic Congressional hopeful John Padora sat in a maroon movie theater chair, saying in his new ad: “I’m sitting in the very same seat Lauren Boebert got kicked out of.

The switch came after a series of embarrassing public incidents and a narrow victory over a Democrat competitor in her home district in 2022.

“Boebert’s an opportunistic carpetbagger and we deserve real leadership here in Colorado’s 4th,” he said, before asking supporters for donations.

Padora’s ad, released days before the Colorado primary races on June 25, highlights how the Beetlejuice incident still plagues the embattled GOP incumbent.

In May, Boebert was welcomed by chants of “Beetlejuice” when she visited George Washington University’s campus amid pro-Gaza protests.


The original article contains 308 words, the summary contains 140 words. Saved 55%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 6 points 5 months ago
[–] CM400@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Here’s the ad for those interested.

[–] Branch_Ranch@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

The primary is Tuesday! I hope she fucking loses!