this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
22 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45726 readers
615 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I try real hard to not only change my mind but vocally (typographically) acknowledge when I was wrong because it's so goddamnit rare and infuriating.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

same here, even when someone hasn't changed my mind 100% I'll often acknowledge if any of their arguments made me want to delve deeper into a topic and think more about my opinion on it

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Same here. I work in tech and you’d be amazed how many people are so much less on guard around me because of this.

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Humans are rationalizing creatures, much more than rational ones. Our first gut reaction is trying to make sense of why we think what we think and why we behave how we behave, rather than trying to figure out if it does actually make sense. If this natural tendency could be changed, the world would be far less of a shithole.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is why, rather than slapping people in the face with a mountain of research, I try to ask them questions that lead them to the conclusion I want them to reach. Oh we discuss along the way, but you get a lot less of the black and white thinking bold statements that someone entrenched in their beliefs tends to make

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

The research backs up your statement. Especially if you yourself are genuinely interested in the conversation, and also willing to update your own thinking, along with helping get everyone in the conversation to start understanding the real answers.

In case you haven't listened to it, the You Are Not So Smart podcast covers the topic of how to get people to change on a pretty regular basis. It's a great podcast that talks a lot about conspiracies, misinformation, and how to combat them.

https://youarenotsosmart.com/podcast/

My favorite part of this podcast is that if you listen to it from the start (nearly 300 episodes at this point), you can hear him slowly become very jaded and pessimistic, but then as the podcast goes on, he starts turning around his opinion and gets exited and optimistic about all the progress that is made. It's a really great podcast and makes me excited for the future.

[–] rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

We're also to some extent innately combative creatures. People will say "Oh, I showed people the facts and they still didn't change their mind. They're just idiots stuck in their ways." Okay, cool. When you tried to present these facts, did you do it in such a way as to treat them courteously or as an equal, or did you do it in such a way that you got to feel like you were dunking on them rhetorically? Because it's not as simple as presenting someone with facts. It's doing so in a way that doesn't make it feel like you're trying to establish some kind of superiority over them. Because then they're not presenting facts to you, they're just attacking you and your position. And these are very different things, conceptually and emotionally.

[–] aksdb@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

That is - IMO - what critical thinking is meant to be .... thinking about alternative explanations and evaluating their viability or probability.

Unfortunately a lot of people use the term "critical thinking" as just another way to rationalize why they are against something, without actually weighing the options.

[–] limitedduck@awful.systems 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

These comments are quite devoid of meme energy

[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Incandemon@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Fucking everything is political. If you think something is too political its because your not political enough.

Your weekend is political, the 8 hour work day is political, the fucking air you breath and the pollution it is fucking political. EVERYTHING IS FUCKING POLITICAL!

[–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A shit post about Chad farquad saying "E" after being asked what's the second vowel is political?

[–] exocrinous@lemm.ee -1 points 10 months ago

Careful, you'll get banned from blahaj zone for talk like that

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If there's one I've learned after being on the internet for 17 years, it's this; you can throw an entire mountain of evidence at a conspiracy theorist and they STILL won't believe you.

[–] isthereany@discuss.online 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Meanwhile back in reality...

  • Fluoride in drinking water isn't safe

  • Iraq doesn't have WMDs and we destroyed their country killing millions for some other reason

  • The government is spying on everything you do

  • JFK assassination must be shady since they keep refusing to release the final documents on it

  • New world order (globalism) is real and now they openly hold meetings and promote the idea

  • The vaccines were not "safe and effective" and many people were maimed and injured for a non-sterilizing vaccine that could never have stopped COVID

  • UFOs apparently do exist and Congress is admitting it

  • The government is brain washing people (MKUltra)

  • The internet is all bots and shills (Dead internet)

  • Many powerful people are pedophiles

Just a handful of "crazy conspiracy theories" that are all seemingly accepted as true now.

[–] chocosoldier@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

um... no? no these aren't all accepted as true now. a couple of those things are, and a couple more are kinda halfway to reality but the rest... dude you need to examine your media diet, someone's feeding you bullshit

[–] isthereany@discuss.online 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Many powerful people are pedophiles

Undeniably true

The internet is all bots and shills (Dead internet)

Undeniably true and getting worse every day now

The government is brain washing people (MKUltra)

Undeniably true

UFOs apparently do exist and Congress is admitting it

Undeniably true, were just halfway to the reality of what they are but weird UFOs apparently do exist

The vaccines were not “safe and effective” and many people were maimed and injured for a non-sterilizing vaccine that could never have stopped COVID

Undeniably true. They were saying "safe and effective" before they even knew it had heightened myocarditis risk. The risk to young men in particular is very high and much higher than any risk they faced from COVID.

New world order (globalism) is real and now they openly hold meetings and promote the idea

Undeniably true. WEF just had their meeting. Countries are signing away rights to WHO. Politicians openly used the words "new world order" several times during COVID.

JFK assassination must be shady since they keep refusing to release the final documents on it

Halfway to reality.

The government is spying on everything you do

Undeniably true. There's a guy in Russia and another in prison in the UK who proved that one already.

Iraq doesn’t have WMDs and we destroyed their country killing millions for some other reason

Undeniably true.

Fluoride in drinking water isn’t safe

Halfway to reality, it's already admitted now previous studies to prove safety were deeply flawed, and new studies are showing risk of neurological damage.

[–] ArrogantAnalyst@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

So you just reviewed your own list by writing “Undeniably true” under nearly every bullet point? xD For some reason I find that very funny.

[–] Obonga@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

Could you link some sources that show how there is a large group of powerful pedophiles? Because for this to be true pedophiles are really not getting any benefits at all which is odd if you ask me. Of course there would be some powerful pedophiles on a planet with 8.000.000.000 People. There also powerful rapists, murderers, holocaust deniers (or is that a hoax too in your opinion), racists etc.

[–] Black616Angel@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

Where are the links to the studies?

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

This is like a meta level recursion.

[–] 30p87@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

Well I don't think that's true

[–] Black616Angel@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

Where are the links to the studies?

[–] Black616Angel@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

Where are the links to the studies?

[–] Black616Angel@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

Where are the links to the studies?