this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
7 points (81.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

5699 readers
2954 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

My boomer parents will die on the hill that it sounds "wrong" to use "they" to refer to a singular entity. And whenever they bring that up, I always remind them that the word "they" has been used in that way for AGES.

Example: "Whose umbrella is this? Did they already leave?"

It doesn't seem to make a difference.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It was beaten into me in school that this is incorrect. “They” is to be used as a plural pronoun only. It’s commonly used in the singular, but it’s wrong according to the English teachers I had. In referring to a person, you must choose either he or she under those grammar rules.

With that said, maybe it’s time for me to move into the future and accept that the meaning of the word has changed. I am confident those English teachers weren’t concerned about actual gender issues. Now, I think those issues are more important than the technical grammatical issues of English.

I’ve offended people in a social setting by insisting that this is the correct usage, when truly it was just me being autistic and informal rather than political.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Perhaps it was the English teachers who were wrong.

Correct or not, people have been using it like that for a while.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they

[–] SLfgb@feddit.nl -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

When my brain interpreted 'they' singular to refer to a unspecified so-far unnamed person or an already mentioned group, it was definitely confusing to have it suddenly used to refer to someone who had just been referred to by name. This was definitely a novel use of 'they' for me at the time and I don't understand why no-one else ever seems to have this kind of confusion. I did get used to it but I don't think it's as universal as some of y'all realise.

Edit: I just learnt the term 'indeterminate antecedent' from the Wikipedia article someone else linked. Thanks to them, I just got a little bit smarter. ;-)

[–] no_name_dev_from_hell@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

As a person who learned English as a 2nd language, I would like it if you could transform the language into gender neutral and end this insanity.

I still get classic genders wrong, this whole LGBTQ movement is confusing me even more when I'm trying to type/speak.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wait until you learn languages with gendered articles

[–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The thing about grammatical gender is that it doesn't really have much to do with sex or gender identity. In German, for instance, 'mädchen' (girl) is neuter. Gender in French is 98% assigned based on the pronunciation of the three final syllables. In Danish, living things tend to be 'common gender' and inanimate objects tend to be 'neuter'.

It'd be more accurate to call it 'noun classes' than gender.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Well, as a German, I wouldn't agree. Generally, nouns describing men are masculine and nouns describing women are feminine. "Das Mädchen" is just an odd one out because it's the diminutive (always neuter in German) of "die Maid", which in turn is feminine.

Yes, this doesn't really apply to objects, but it mostly does for people.

[–] SLfgb@feddit.nl -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Child - das Kind - grammatical gender: neuter. Referred to in context using the gender-neutral pronoun 'es' (it). The pronoun used correlates with the grammatical gender of the noun used, not the gender of the person referred to.

Eg Ein Kind lacht. Es hat etwas gesehen. (transl: A child laughs. He/she/they saw something.)

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I know. But generally, the gender of the noun describing a person correlates with the gender of the person described strongly.

[–] SLfgb@feddit.nl -1 points 6 months ago

Ok but my point is that when it doesn't correlate, it becomes clear how grammatical gender is independent from the person's gender.

It becomes even clearer when you consider all nouns by definition have a grammatical gender - inanimate objects, abstract concepts, etc, even though the thing described clearly doesn't have a gender. Eg die Tür ist offen. Ich schliesse sie. (transl.: the door is open. I close it.) 'Sie' being the female pronoun used to refer to the grammatically female door.

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Guarantee most of the people who argue about pronouns on the internet don't even know a trans person.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

and most decent transfolks don't give a shit about prounouns. they just want to be left alone and stop being made into child raping monsters by politicans looking to scare up the voter base.

[–] raptorattacks@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean... I care about pronouns, so do most of my trans friends, and I'd like to think we're all "decent" trans folks. It sucks when someone misgenders you. I would also like the conservatives in my country to stop using trans rights as a wedge issue. I can care about both of these things at the same time.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'd like people to stop screaming at me for misgendering them when I meant no ill-will. Just like I don't scream at people when they ask me if I'm Italian or when they mispronounce my surname.

God forbid we don't get pissed off at people for making mistakes, especially strangers.

[–] bremen15@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My question comes from a grammar /German background: We have four cases. They have different pronouns. Which ones should I list?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Whichever ones you want English speakers to use when referring to you.

Simple, isn't it?

[–] bremen15@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Everything is simple when you know the solution.

I was not really expecting English speakers to use my German pronouns, they are for German speaking people.

Would that be the Dativ or Akkusativ form? They are both quite common and important

[–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah, kinda true, kinda whataboutism... If calling other people by their chosen pronouns being their biggest problem, is your biggest problem... I'm envious of their life and your life... Thanks, I'm fine, lets not trade lives.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Honest question - what is the whataboutism here?

[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

dude, chill. it's like 2am. that's a good time to chirp like a cricket... 😆

[–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That pronouns isn't a legitimate problem to have, because "what about" more severe problems in life. That Green is implying to trade with the non-issue (or lesser issue) of pronouns.

[–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Hmm. >80% of Lemmy voters don't like the same logic applied in reverse? Is that being hypocrites, or am I missing something?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The problem with your "logic" is that Green never said it was his biggest problem. And if you can find me someone who does say that people not calling others by their correct pronouns is their biggest problem, I would be very surprised.

I would suggest to you that if this was John Green's biggest problem, he wouldn't make a glib tweet about it.

[–] h3ndrik@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Hmmh. But I mean even that also applies in reverse. Also the "pronouns people" don't say it's their biggest problem. At least the ones I've ever met. So Greens post has the same logical shortcomings as I have.

[–] boomer@lemy.lol -1 points 6 months ago

If you're not on-board with the LGBTQ movement, are you a transphobe?