this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
247 points (97.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
581 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When you connect a new device to a 'smart' tv, you must pay homage to the manufacturer with a ritualistic dance. Plugging and unplugging the device. Turning them on and off in the correct sequence like entering a konami code.

Every time you want to switch devices, the tv must scan for them. And god forbid you lose power, or unplug something. You are granted the delight experience of doing it all over again.

I have fond memories of the days of just plugging something in, and pressing the input button. Instant gratification. It was a simpler time.

What is some other tech that used to be better?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago (4 children)

The physical aspect of laptops - the old ThinkPads were fucking amazing and while their specs may not be much to look at today they were equipped with adequate cooling and could take a fair amount of beating.

I don't want a light thin laptop that I could snap in two with one hand... I want a laptop that isn't going to overheat and can survive a few tumbles when someone trips over the power cord.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] psivchaz@reddthat.com 13 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Video games. Don't get me wrong, there are still some great games, but the entire experience has degraded on average.

  • The inclusion of obnoxiously long, often unskippable, intro sequences with studio credits and such. There used to be maybe a logo, maybe a very short sequence at worst, and almost always skippable.
  • Most of the big budget games are intended to be a grindy slog, often to get you to spend more money on micro transactions. Fun takes a back seat to intentionally addictive but objectively less enjoyable experiences.
  • Others are intended to be cinematic experience. Some of that can be fun, but sometimes I just want something like the old Sonic or Mario games that I can just pick up, play for a bit, and put down.
  • Enjoy a game? You could talk to friends about it at school, or buy a magazine that talks about it. The experience now is largely an unregulated online wasteland... If you find a community, it may quickly be beset by people that you really don't want to associate with, posting crap that no magazine ever would have published. Except for some of the funnier magazines, which may have published it just to rightfully mock the person.

The graphics have improved. In some cases the gameplay has improved. I don't want to downplay those. I'm just annoyed with how the overall experience has gotten worse on average.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 11 points 4 months ago

Funny, I think video games, on the whole, are approaching a real golden age. Sure (like you said) if you stick to the $70 titles produced by big studios you're going to have an increasingly bad time. But the quality of ""Indie"" (but not even really since Indie studios are legit full companies now) games is rising damn-near exponentially. I personally haven't felt a need to choose an ""AAA"" title over an indie title in years and not only am I saving money but I'm enjoying my time with video games more than I ever have (including childhood!) in my life.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Tupperware. Grandmas stuff is still around. It’s probably unhealthy to use but modern stuff doesn’t last.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fribbtastic@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Connectivity or rather the lack of it...

I have a Samsung TV and recently got a new cooling fan and now when I start the fan when my TV is on, it says it detected a new device. I don't know what my TV would want with a fan maybe control the speed for more immersion?

But there is also no way for me to disable that. I also got regular requests of my neighbor's to connect to my TV until I disabled the notification for it. No, I couldn't disable that my TV doesn't even allow it to be seen, I had to enable to not automatically connect devices and disable that notifications are being shown. That thing isn't even connected to the internet.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Alsjemenou@lemy.nl 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Depending on your definition of 'better' . In terms of repair ability and ease of maintenance, pretty much all old tech. In terms of price... There is no chance, it's insane how cheap tech has gotten.

The power consumption of old stuff is also extremely bad compared to now. So yeh you can have fridges, washing machines, or whatever appliances from the 70's that still work and are easy to maintain.. They use way, way, way too much power for what they do. In an ideal world where energy is free, sure that stuff is better. We don't tho.

Also, basically everything that uses software while it shouldn't, has a worse user experience than before.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago (10 children)

XMPP > Matrix | Slack | Telegram

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (7 children)

I have fond memories of the days of just plugging something in, and pressing the input button. Instant gratification. It was a simpler time.

Dunno what kind of TVs you're using, but my Sony OLED pretty much behaves exactly like this. The Smart TV features are laggy and shit as usual, but those are still features that didn't exist in the old days so it's not a 1 to 1 comparison.

But with regards to just plugging in a blu ray or PS5 and hitting the input button, that's exactly how my modern TV works.

In fact, I don't even need to turn it on or hit the input button... Since they're both Sony, all I need to do is press the button on my PS5 controller and it turns on my TV and PS5 and switches to the correct input, without having to touch the remote. And vice versa (can turn on/off and control PS5 menus with the TV remote).

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago
[–] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Just don't connect your TV to the internet and plug in a raspi. All the "smart" you could ever want without the bloat

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Smart TVs and cae infotainnent systems, for sinilar reasons. Full of bloat, so many bugs and unreliable functioning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 8 points 4 months ago

Most electric appliances in the second version. Always some lock-in anti repair bullship.

[–] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Using a typewriter was a nightmare, but the keyboard feel was so satisfying.

You can bring it back!

Or just use a mechanical (200$+) keyboard!

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί