this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
781 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

60023 readers
2762 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Well that's not going to work out.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Eh, I don't think this is the best solution.

The assumption is as soon as you turn 17 you're smart enough and have the critical thinking skills to navigate social media without it negatively affecting you? Kinda dumb.

There could be an argument that at least try to block it while young peoples brains are still developing, maybe there's benefit in that.

Older people than 16 are still duped by propaganda, and become addicted to social media, and all the negative consequences.

What we need is regulation imo. Good, smart, progressive, altruistic regulation that is for the benefit of all. Ain't gonna happen though, because sOcIaLiSm and "mUh FrEeDoMs".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jason_Ph03nix@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

For a second I thought the headline said Australia banned social media for 16 seconds 🤣

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

ah yea that'll work

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You know in the eyes of government, Lemmy is also social media.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

People should be allowed to do as they please. I think, however, people should be presented with all the potential risks in very clear language if they're going to, in the same way a pack of cigarettes has a warning, access to social media should present similar disclaimers.

[–] lung@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Then I read that chat apps and YouTube would not be banned, and scoffed

Literally chat apps are social media. You can post stories and pump memes and news. You can even have bots that scrape and post content. YouTube is just a matter of checking a box whether it's "for kids" and they already do that. Basically the whole thing is stupid

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Ah fuck. Canada is likely to copycat this, we love copying Australia's homework. NDP and Cons BOTH already favor this idea except it's also all 18+ websites. Gov ID to wack off. Puritans are on every wing and I wish we could shake them off.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 6 points 3 weeks ago

Now ban everyone else (except Lemmy of course).

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›