We do a lot of commemorative stamps instead.
this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
967 points (99.5% liked)
Microblog Memes
5885 readers
3908 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Maybe we shouldn't have slave owners on our money? I dunno? Just maybe...
It's just monkeys singing songs, mate. Don't think too hard about it.
Wait wait wait... are you saying you don't have any commemorative coins in the USA?! Holy shit I never realised! We have special coins all the time in Europe. My kids absolutely love when they find a special 2€ coin with some cool engraving on it.
How sad! You could have so many, too! By default each country in the Euro zone has its own heads, while tails are always the same. Easy peasy!
No we do have commemorative $1 coins, Sacagawea had one and they're fairly common change from vending machines. There's an older Susan B Anthony. Harriet Tubman had one but I've never seen it.
There was a set of quarters where the back was related to each state.
Wikipedia says we're supposed to be running a series honoring inventors from every state but no one wants $1 coins, so...
As an Australian, Australia doesnt exsist...
New Zealand does though, right? Right?
It does. It has Hobbits and Elves. Really cool
Australia was just a myth, made up to scare the British lower class, but its a joke that got way out of hand and now nobody knows how to stop it
Let's not forget the ones with the Olympic fursona on them!
10 euro coins are pretty common across Europe, but only legal tender in the issuing country.
Colour coins? That's cursed.
Hah, that probably pissed off a lot of people. I love it.
I bet there are some people out there who refuse to accept these coins as change, lest they catch "The Gay".
load more comments
(4 replies)
What the fuck? 10 year anniversary? That hurts
Zoomer posting?
They're probably surprised that it's only been legal for ten years
load more comments
(1 replies)
It's the US, we put presidents and Founding Fathers on our bills. Harriet Tubman is neither, so of course we're not putting her on the twenty.
Instead we should compromise with historical precedent and put Obama on the twenty - he's both a president and a black historical figure and he'll piss off the people pissed off by the idea of Tubman on the twenty even more. It's a win all around!
Salmon P. Chase was neither a president nor a founding father yet he was on a bill. Though he was qualified in that he served as a white man for, I believe, his whole life.
He put "in god we trust" on the money.
That's why he's on a bill.
Granted it's the 10k note and there's kind of an inverse relationship with value of note to respect of person.
Which is why Washington is on the 1 dollar note and Hamilton is on the 10.
Thats not even a good thing though. And why not put other historical figures on money? Would it be so objectionable to out MLK Jr or General Sherman on money?
Anyone on the $20 would be better than Andrew "Trail of Tears" Jackson. The dude also caused the deepest, by percentage not dollar amount, and longest depression in US history by paying off the national debt.
It wasn't paying off the debt that caused the depression, that's deliberate misinformation to make you think debt is good, take out a lifestyle loan, don't think about it! What's a forever war or two paid paid for on credit, anyways?
What caused the depression was how he paid off the debt, namely by crashing the real estate market selling off stolen native land for cheap.
Government debt is in no way comparable to personal debt. You are spreading misconceptions and misunderstanding of high finance, if not outright lies.
Paying off all American debt is directly what caused the depression, since we were founded as a nation of traders. Pay off all the debt, and we don't have any currency that is useful to other countries, and all our trade agreements died up.
Now how much debt is too much for the US to carry, is another discussion altogether
Okay buddy, keep on sucking on that hyperinflation and asking daddy for more👍
It's not like the same people telling you debt is good are out to "Starve the Beast" or America doesn't have comparatively more debt than it ended Fucking World War 2 with.
The hyperinflation that has been going on in Japan for the last 30 years while they have had the money hose on? Oh, wait that's right. They're barely staying off deflation. Or maybe there was some hyperinflation here in the US? No? Not since the Great Depression? Huh. Strange that.
You're just showing that you know nothing about either modern economics or monetary theory.
Bruh, you're bare assed trying to compare Jacksonian policy to modern deficit spending, like they weren't on the GOLD FUCKING STANDARD, lmao.
Dudes with one college econ class acting like experts, I swear.
Historically the US has been loath to use our gold stockpiles to buy anything. Even when we were on the gold standard, we didn't trade with it. It is historical fact that our trade agreements collapsed and that caused the longest and deepest depression in US history.
Just because you happen to be fiscally conservative, doesn't mean that is a good way to run a government, and history has shown this time and again. Conservatives wreck the economy, liberals attempt to fix it, and the one time in history that we started to look at progressive policy, in 2020, it caused such a massive economic surplus that the rich freaked out and imposed artificial austerity.
Yes, and that's one of the reasons why it's ridiculous to compare the two situations. Jackson might have been able to spend his way out of the depression the market collapse caused but it wasn't paying off a debt that caused it.
Anarchist btw.
If you think that history is divided into discrete events, which you seem to do, you will never be able to parse what was going on.
It isn't surprising, since you openly claim to be a conservative, but the problem with most anarchists is that they are conservatives at heart and want to divide history into discrete moments in which a single great figure managed to change things.
From here is what I have heard from the mouths of multiple "anarchists" in 49/50 states, IRL. These are the people you are aligned with. : You are actively opposed to democracy, which means that you are actively opposed to the US Constitution. You don't believe in corporations, which I wouldn't have an issue with, but you are also opposed to nationalized co-ops. You want to keep money, but you want to somehow get rid of capitalism? None of this shit works in the real world, which just underscores your complete lack of ability to take a look at multiple variables at once. In case you didn't know, Jackson policies created Keynsean economic theory, and the lack of the gold standard. Do try to keep up.
Comparing the two situations is perfectly logical once you realize that one literally created the other in the case of the US.
load more comments
(12 replies)
load more comments
(10 replies)
view more: next ›