this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
82 points (100.0% liked)

Linguistics

523 readers
96 users here now

Welcome to the community about the science of human Language!

Everyone is welcome here: from laymen to professionals, Historical linguists to discourse analysts, structuralists to generativists.

Rules:

  1. Stay on-topic. Specially for more divisive subjects.
  2. Post sources whenever reasonable to do so.
  3. Avoid crack theories and pseudoscientific claims.
  4. Have fun!

Related communities:

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link: https://archive.ph/cIz4A

It's dated to be from around 2400 BCE. The article doesn't clarify if it's a true alphabet or an abjad, but either way it's interesting.

all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] s3p5r@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago

While this discovery is very cool, this bothered me:

"Alphabets revolutionized writing by making it accessible to people beyond royalty and the socially elite. Alphabetic writing changed the way people lived, how they thought, how they communicated,"

Ancient Chinese scripts seemed to manage just fine, even during their "writing is magical and only the rich are smart enough to know that magic" phase. Is it possible that the alphabet itself didn't change the way people lived, but perhaps the people who introduced it to the area changed the way the original inhabitants lived? The conclusion that the alphabet was the cause just seems really Western exceptionalist to me.

[–] observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca 10 points 7 hours ago

This press release is pretty crap, but there is more info here: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/worlds-oldest-alphabet-discovered/

[–] rothaine@beehaw.org 1 points 6 hours ago

"Chon"

Big chongus?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 10 hours ago

No sane Middle Eastern language would use a true alphabet, so probably an abjad.

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago