this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
230 points (89.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21378 readers
1273 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 8 points 49 minutes ago (1 children)

    ohhh this one hit a nerve. the butthurt windows users community is out in full force :D And there are still Stockholm syndrome victims delusional enough to think that Windows is easier to install / maintain without realizing that the only thing that has them insist is habit.

    [–] StrongHorseWeakNeigh@lemmy.world -1 points 8 minutes ago (1 children)

    Come get me when games are as easy to play on Linux as they are on windows

    [–] lancalot@discuss.online 1 points 1 minute ago

    Honestly, in terms of ease to play, SteamOS (or clones like Bazzite) don't do under Windows. Heck, I'd argue they might even be easier.

    The real issue is anti-cheat. But that's just the next hurdle we'll have to overcome.

    [–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 38 minutes ago

    no restart required

    Not true for immutable

    [–] twinnie@feddit.uk 31 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (7 children)

    Let’s not cherrypick scenarios to try and pretend Linux is easier than Windows. Most normal people are nervous interacting with a GUI pop-up that gives them two options, never mind putting them into a terminal window where they could seriously fuck up their machine. What about clicking the download link on a webpage, clicking next a few times and having them software on your machine, compared to having to build something from GitHub (how many people here have never had to do that?).

    [–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 36 minutes ago (1 children)

    Most normal people are nervous interacting with a GUI pop-up that gives them two options, never mind putting them into a terminal window where they could seriously fuck up their machine

    Maybe this is a problem that we should be addressing, rather than just making technology more of a black box, and raising generations of people who have no fucking concept of how any of it works.

    [–] Exec@pawb.social 1 points 27 minutes ago

    and raising generations of people who have no fucking concept of how any of it works

    Only two generations were got to be technologically literate.

    [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 4 points 28 minutes ago (1 children)

    Let's also not conflate "ease" with historical behavior.

    Taking previous experience out of the equation, it is easier to type apt upgrade and reboot to update your entire system than to click through 300 times in the system and multiple apps with reboots.

    That is a fact.

    [–] uranibaba@lemmy.world 4 points 25 minutes ago

    You don't even need the terminal. There is a interface to update if you are using a DE.

    [–] Ooops 1 points 12 minutes ago

    Most normal people are nervous interacting with a GUI pop-up that gives them two options

    Sadly no. They should be nervous if it's about making changes to their system. In reality however Windows conditioned them to just click the button labeled "Yes" or "Okay" without even reading the pop-up in the first place.

    [–] babybus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 46 minutes ago

    Let’s not cherrypick scenarios to try and pretend Linux is easier than Windows. Most normal people are...

    Let's not cherry pick users then. I don't care about your normal users. My experience is better on Linux.

    [–] aski3252@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

    Unless you have a system without a GUI, you don't need to open a terminal in order to update or install stuff. There is a GUI for that. And no, you don't need to build stuff from GitHub for normal user stuff..

    [–] Noobnarski@lemmy.world -3 points 53 minutes ago (1 children)

    I tried that on linux, it doesn't work if you want to do more than browse the web and other basic stuff.

    You can do some seriously advanced stuff on windows using only GUIs

    [–] aski3252@lemmy.world 2 points 40 minutes ago

    We were talking about normal user stuff that normal users do, not "seriously advanced stuff".. And I agree that most normal users probably don't want to use terminals because they are not familiar with them. But normal users probably don't and shouldn't do "seriously advanced stuff", no?

    Yes, if you are trying to do "serously advanced stuff" (whatever that means), chances are you will probably need a terminal (or a terminal will at least be easier), but you shouldn't be doing "seriously advanced stuff" unless you know what you are doing anyway...

    [–] abfarid@startrek.website 12 points 2 hours ago

    This applies to pretty much all "Linux good, Win/MacOS bad" memes. I just assume that people either aren't really serious about them and it's just tongue in cheek, or they don't have any contact with regular people.

    I used to work as a(n assistant to the) sysadmin and the things I got called over never stopped to amaze. For instance, there was a case when software was updated on the work machines and I got called because some lady couldn't use Adobe Acrobat. "It is asking me something, I don't know what". I come over and it's just a TOS Accept/Decline window.

    Some people do not understand computers to an extent that they can lock up in a state of confusion when a button has been moved 100px in any direction from its usual position.

    [–] IHateReddit@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

    been using linux for a few years both on servers and my pc and I never had to build sth myself

    [–] DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

    Missing dependency? Don't you like living away from your parents?

    [–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 33 points 4 hours ago (7 children)

    No restart require on Linux is a joke, right? Because I get updates that require restarts as often as I get them on Windows when updating Mint.

    [–] Camille@lemmy.ml 36 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

    Unless you're updating the kernel itself, there is little chance you actually need to reboot your machine. Just restarting whatever service or application you're using should do the trick.

    [–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

    This is the same on Windows, you can just carry on and then complete an update when you go to shut down the machine. Can't remember the last time an app install or update required the whole OS to be restarted immediately.

    [–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

    I remember what it's called, but at some point there was an app for windows that would check if your machine actually needed a restart or not. Basically the "restart your machine" prompt is mostly just a boilerplate. It's very rare that those installers touch anything that can't actually be loaded without a restart.

    [–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

    Just following the update manager instructions

    [–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 hour ago

    Kde neon made me reboot Everytime it updated. Turns out there was a setting I could disable. Afterwards I was never bugged about rebooting.

    Used discover for updates

    Maybe you have such a setting?

    [–] Camille@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 hours ago

    You do you, it can't hurt to reboot and work on a fresh restart. But if for some reasons you need to keep your machine up, you'll know it is less of a problem than on windows typically

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] Blueteabag@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

    Really? I need to restart my Windows less often, Fedora asks me every other day restart my PC to install updates

    [–] spicytuna62@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

    Fedora issue. I restart my Debian machines maybe once every 4-6 weeks.

    [–] uranibaba@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago

    I have the save experience with popos

    [–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

    Besides a kernel update... Which one?

    Honest question, as I usually just restart to be sure I haven't missed to restart a service or something, but theoretically I could restart every program and service, that got updated.

    Maybe Mint is very conservative here...

    [–] some_random_nick@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

    Fedora requiers them all the time. Sometimes there is a driver update in there.

    [–] IHateReddit@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

    they're not required, only the update manager thing wants you to. if you update via dnf you don't need to restart 90% of the time

    [–] fogetaboutit@programming.dev 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

    Probably driver update, like nvidia?

    [–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 hours ago

    Ah yeah, mostly kernel module updates go along with a kernel update. But you are right, yeah.

    Although, should be possible to just reload the module and restart X/Wayland, no?

    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] hinterlufer@lemmy.world 20 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

    somepackage requires otherpackage version >10.1.79

    otherpackage is already at latest version

    Have fun compiling it yourself and messing up what is managed by the package manager and what's not. And don't forget that the update might break some other package along the way

    [–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 32 minutes ago

    Huh, pacman always seemed to automatically work out those dependency loops, or whatever you want to call them, when I was on EndeavourOS. The only time I had an issue with updating was when I went like two weeks without updating, and then ran out of harddrive space halfway through installing the 600 updates.

    [–] Tiempo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 48 minutes ago

    Manjaro, is that you?

    [–] crony@lemmy.cronyakatsuki.xyz 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

    If your distro maintainer's do a good job, that situation never happen's.

    Or just use gentoo where that problem doensn't exist at all.

    [–] abfarid@startrek.website 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

    Don't use apostrophes wherever you see an "s" at the end of a word. If you're unsure about whether or not to use an apostrophe, just don't. Because statistically, there are far fewer cases where you need 'em than there are cases where you don't. Plus if you missed the apostrophe where it should be, people will just assume you didn't bother to type it or it was a typo. Whereas if you do type it where it shouldn't be, it's a clear case of "this person doesn't know how apostrophes work".

    [–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 9 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

    Chocolatey is the best option I've found for this on Windows:

    Chocolatey was created by Rob Reynolds in 2011 with the simple goal of offering a universal package manager for Windows. Chocolatey is an open source project that provides developers and admins alike a better way to manage Windows software.

    You can install & uninstall software from the command line and update everything installed through it with one command.

    It's not a real package manager of course. It can't update the operating system, and Windows applications aren't built for modularity and shared libraries the way Linux applications are. But it does automate application management like nothing else. I highly recommend this if you use Windows.

    [–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

    There's winget now too, which is the official Windows package manager. I've used it a couple of times now and worked as expected, not sure how it compares to chocolatey outside of simple app installs though.

    [–] uranibaba@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

    I love winget, at least for the initial installation. No more having to search the the download and click through a gui. Just one or two commands (two if searching for the id) and done.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] gramie@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

    I've been a Linux user on and off since 1996, and there are still times when I give up trying to install software because of cryptic error messages.

    Yes, I had my parents using Linux Mint for about 5 years, but eventually my brother who lived near them switched them to Windows because if there was a problem with Linux he couldn't help.

    Don't worry, this is definitely the year of the Linux desktop.

    [–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 34 minutes ago

    Perhaps its just gotten better, but I've been on it for a year or two now, and I haven't come across an error message that didn't bring up solutions when copy/pasted into google. Definitely varies by distro though, I was on EndeavourOS for most of that time, and being Arch, it has like infinite documentation.

    [–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 14 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

    You're forgetting winget. It's actually really good.

    [–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

    Winget sucks ass. Fails half of the time, lists way too much I did not install through Winget m, even had apps broken because of bad updates through Winget.

    Never had these problems with scoop or chocolatey though.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] VonVoelksen@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 4 hours ago

    I don't like windows either, but updating with Winget in terminal works pretty good. Not as good as with Linux, but better than downloading every app via browser.

    load more comments
    view more: next ›