this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
138 points (98.6% liked)

World News

39096 readers
2469 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Australia has introduced a bill to ban social media access for children under 16, enforcing strict penalties of up to AU$50 million for non-compliance.

The law would require biometric or government ID for age verification and prohibits parental consent as an exemption.

While aiming to protect children from harmful content, critics argue it may drive teens to unregulated platforms.

Some services, like YouTube and WhatsApp, will be exempt for educational or messaging purposes.

The bill has bipartisan support but faces scrutiny from independents and child welfare advocates.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago

The law would require biometric or government ID for age verification and prohibits parental consent as an exemption.

Fuck that noise. It’s almost as egregious as those US states that demand porn websites require Gov’t issued ID.

I don’t want copies of those documents processed by these corps; you just know they will use it to train their LLMs on it, store it inappropriately, and ultimately end up leaking them due to a misconfigured S3 bucket somewhere.

[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

yeah but it's australia. their under 16 is our under 91.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

this is just giving up privacy in exchange for children still bypassing it anyways lol

[–] shrodes@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

It’s a feature not a bug.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah our governments, globally, are light years behind tech companies. I still need to send notarized letters for things when, as an American, the dod, nsa, fbi, cia, etc all are using palantir software by the quizat haderach Peter Thiel which has more information on me than any other involved party.

This just feels like a slow burn into making lisan al gaib able to observe everything I do.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This bill is unlikely to pass.

But not impossible. Australia passes some dumb shit sometimes.

[–] Fashim@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Remember when Turnbull said that the laws of mathematics are subject to the laws of Australia in regards to encryption?

Yeah we do some really dumb shit.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago

What’s worse is that prior to being a PM, he was chairman of the board at OzEmail prior to them being bought out by iiNet. You would have hoped by working for a technology company he’d have some semblance of a clue about encryption. 🤦🏻‍♂️

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

Well there was that time Indiana tried to legislate pi to 3, so at least you're not alone.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"The laws of mathematics are very commendable, but the only law that applies in Australia is the law of Australia."

Brother thinks he can force companies to break unbreakable encryption because the law says so lmfao

[–] solomon42069@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Yay ineffective posturing! I hope they spent millions on Facebook ads.. /s

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] kautau@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

[insert every shitty law that has ever been passed]. It’s a proposal…

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago

kautau: every proposal passes!

[–] ulterno@programming.dev -1 points 1 day ago

So now you can't use your voice to convey speech out of class, if you are under 16?
Because Air is a medium which can be used to socialise.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

How will we ever control the minds of children if we can't control their computers? How will we even force our narratives on them without removing all counter-narratives? How can they ever be happy without taking away their freedom and information? Go Australia! Keep that delusional settler vibe strong! \s