this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
623 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59517 readers
3154 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 35 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Okay so the 2015 EOL ones, yeah I can understand telling the customer to update their shit. They shouldn't have to support nearly 10 year out of date stuff.

May 2024 EOL ones? Bruh. C'mon now.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago

I would love to know when they stopped selling it compared to the EOL. EOL should be at least 5 years past the last time the models were shipped out, maybe more. So if May 2024 was EOL I sure hope they weren't selling them after 2018.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 22 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

there should be list of companies that should be avoided and why, its impossible to keep track of everything like this

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

An idea for an app I came up with for a class once was one that let you scan a barcode of a product in like Walmart and get what parent company owns it, like how Nestle doesn't like to put their name on companies they bought (or not in big text anyways).
So if you want to avoid Coca Cola you could scan it and see who it's owned by and if that company matches one of the ones you have blacklisted

Fun fact, 'peace tea' is owned by coca cola

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 hours ago

There's an app called 'buycott' that does exactly that!

[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Unfortunately, that list would be almost complete. It would be much easier (and realistic) to maintain its complement.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 32 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Long ago, D-Link was good but then they sold the company. Just like Alienware, Farbreware, Oaklies, etc.

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Oakley, like the sunglasses company? What happened to them?

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago

Luxottica. I've visited their HQ in soCal, people aren't having fun and coming up with wacky designs anymore.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 43 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Be nice if companies had to open source firmware they are going to EoL.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 23 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Be nice?

It must become.law. we want to lower e-waste? Yen if companies stop supporting their products, het must open source all of it

[–] toothpaste_ostrich@feddit.nl 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, be nice if the US didn't turn into a dictatorship in a few months. Don't see any company-unfriendly laws going in effect there any time soon. But perhaps in Europe there's still some chance of this happening.

[–] fxdave@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

Hopefully, but it's easier to tell each company what they should do instead of giving them rules that they try to workaround. There are many examples.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 29 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Not going to hold my breath that anything like this will happen in the current political climate, but yeah, that should be mandatory. Even ignoring the exploitive nature towards their customers, it creates a ton of unnecessary waste.

Exactly. As a consumer, when I buy a product, I'm not just buying the state of things at the time, I'm buying with an expectation of ongoing support. If they choose to not support it themselves, I should be able to support it myself.

In the old days, hardware came with schematics, so when the manufacturer warranty ended, customers could repair things themselves. That should extend to software as well, since software is just as much a part of the functioning of a device as capacitors and whatnot.

[–] DuckWrangler9000@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

A bunch of juvenile D-Linkuents. Get it? D-Link? Nevermind....

[–] darkangelazuarl@lemmy.world 53 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

The DSR-150 is still being sold on Amazon under the D-Link store. Why the hell would you end of life something you still sell.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 hours ago

Just say you are from the Middle East.

Product Status (Revision Series_v1500): Live - The product is actively being manufactured and sold."

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 15 points 10 hours ago

Don't want to get lumbered with a bunch of old stock now, do you?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Technically most if not all Amazon sellers are third party who sell to the warehouse and then it sits there until its listing contract expires.

Thats why Rode Microphone refuses to sell on Amazon.

[–] darkangelazuarl@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Then recall all the end of life stock.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Perfect time for users to buy something that isn't D-Link then innit.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It baffles my mind how people have picked up a cheap knockoff manufacturer and forcibly made it into a major brand... That still produces junk at same 5 dollar knockoff quality level it had from the start.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I'm confused which brands you speak of, Asus used to be very good

load more comments
view more: next ›