this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
32 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

1326 readers
135 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Researchers at the University of Chicago and Argonne National Lab have developed a new type of optical memory that stores data by transferring light from rare-earth element atoms embedded in a solid material to nearby quantum defects. They published their study in Physical Review Research.

Study: https://journals.aps.org/prresearch/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033170

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

It kinda sounds elaborate? Like, how practical is that, especially in regards to being a standard?

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Data density vs IOPS.
Mechanical media are slow.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

Well, for backups this still sounds kinda nice

Tape backups are rather slow as well - at least as far as I know. The professional stuff was always out of my league monetary wise.

If someone has a good alternative, I'm absolutely up for it.

Currently I'm using a local server with just a RAID1 to mirror important files on my workstation and those (incremental) backups are getting encrypted and uploaded to a cloud drive.

But for really large data amounts, this isn't really practical. So I only use this route for business documents, invoices, etc.
But for large data like code, I'm currently only doing a local mirroring (although on multiple devices), so if my office burns down, I'll lose quite much - at the moment I'm lucky, because I can push my code changes to a customer git mirror, so I should be fine on that front for now.

But still, I loathe the day, I really need to restore from my cloud backup.
Maybe I should do some dry runs periodically, to verify my restore path works. But just like server stuff, I really don't like to touch it that much o⁠:⁠-⁠)

I'm currently using BORG (with Vorta) to backup everything locally and distribute it to my server and the cloud.

If anyone has a better idea, I'd be really grateful...

Doing periodically hard disk backups and giving them to a partner company (while I keep theirs in my safe) seems to not really work out in the long term, as I'm often on business trips and our exchanges got more seldom over time...