this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
748 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

58937 readers
3476 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hogmomma@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Don't stop at social media. Put that same limit on religion, too.

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Are you pointing out how you don't like this law or are you actually suggesting we ban religion for kids?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I'm thinking neither one is really enforceable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's norway, so that's kinda pointless

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 3 days ago (6 children)

How do they define what a social media is?

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago (10 children)

And most importantly: How would they enforce that? Kids have been lying about their ages since the dawn of internet.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't think they really need to.

Laws are often just an acknowledgement of a society's expectation.

"We've all decided that kids under 15 using social isn't great."

The fact that this law exists makes it infinitely b easier for parents to establish and maintain rules in their household, because peer pressure is minimised.

Yes, some kids will still use social before they're 15. Perhaps most kids. However, I think harmfully excessive use will be minimised.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You may use it only until you are 15. Alternately, you may choose any 15-year window in your life. Choose wisely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Governmental overreach. Good luck trying to enforce this shit.

Social media isn't bad inherently. Addictive algorithms, violation of user privacy, etc. is bad.

Kids should be taught how to make use of social media for good. I was bullied quite a lot as a kid. Social media is what kinda brought me out of it.

Social media told 13 year old me, that it is alright to be gay. Social media is what made me interested in politics. A huge part of who I am today is because of the nice people I met online. Fuck the government for trying to take it away from others like me.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Social media isn’t bad inherently. Addictive algorithms, violation of user privacy, etc. is bad.

Cigarettes aren't bad for you. It's just the burning tar and the nicotine.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But social media don't have to burn tar. They chose to because this way they can get more money, but it's not an inherent part of the system, it's an exploitation of it for profit, and can be separated

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›